Report page 95

Data Table 2: attacker data for all attackers and three subgroups

Data Table 2 (Attacker Data) reports gender, age range, race/ethnicity, arrests/charges, history of domestic violence, mental health symptoms, stressors, concerning communications, elicited concern, bullying/harassment, inappropriate interest in violence or weapons, and behavior change for all attackers (n = 51) and for current or former employees (n = 22), customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and romantic partners and relatives (n = 9). The column ns printed are 51 | 22 | 20 | 9.

ATTACKER DATA

• Attackers
• Demographics
• Mass Attacks Dataset
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

History of domestic violence means at least one incident, with or without arrest or charge

In Data Table 2, history of domestic violence indicates at least one incident of domestic violence, which may or may not have resulted in an arrest or criminal charge.

*Indicates at least one incident of domestic violence which may or may not have resulted in an arrest or criminal charge.

• Domestic Violence
• Key Terms

cite page 95 Appendices

Male attackers: all 96%, employees 95%, customers 95%, partners/relatives 100%

Data Table 2 reports that 96% of all attackers (n = 51) were male, as were 95% of current or former employees (n = 22), 95% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 100% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Male | 96% | 95% | 95% | 100%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Female attackers: all 2%, employees 0%, customers 5%, partners/relatives 0%

Data Table 2 reports that 2% of all attackers (n = 51) were female, as were 0% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Female | 2% | 0% | 5% | 0%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Other gender: all 2%, employees 5%, customers 0%, partners/relatives 0%

Data Table 2 reports an other gender for 2% of all attackers (n = 51), 5% of current or former employees (n = 22), 0% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Other | 2% | 5% | 0% | 0%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Ages: all 22-66 (41.0 avg), employees 22-64 (40.1), customers 23-66 (41.1), partners 27-58 (42.9)

Data Table 2 gives an age range of 22-66 (41.0 average) for all attackers (n = 51), 22-64 (40.1 average) for current or former employees (n = 22), 23-66 (41.1 average) for customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 27-58 (42.9 average) for romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

**Age Range (average)** | 22-66 (41.0 avg) | 22-64 (40.1 avg) | 23-66 (41.1 avg) | 27-58 (42.9 avg)

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

White (non-Hispanic/unknown): all 41%, employees 32%, customers 55%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports that 41% of all attackers (n = 51) were White (non-Hispanic/ethnicity unknown), as were 32% of current or former employees (n = 22), 55% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

White (non-Hispanic/ethnicity unknown) | 41% | 32% | 55% | 33%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Black/African American: all 29%, employees 50%, customers 10%, partners/relatives 22%

Data Table 2 reports that 29% of all attackers (n = 51) were Black/African American, as were 50% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 22% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Black/African American | 29% | 50% | 10% | 22%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Hispanic/Latino: all 14%, employees 9%, customers 20%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 2 reports that 14% of all attackers (n = 51) were Hispanic/Latino, as were 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 20% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Hispanic/Latino | 14% | 9% | 20% | 11%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Asian: all 12%, employees 9%, customers 5%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports that 12% of all attackers (n = 51) were Asian, as were 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Asian | 12% | 9% | 5% | 33%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Race/ethnicity undetermined: all 4%, employees 0%, customers 10%, partners/relatives 0%

Data Table 2 reports race/ethnicity as undetermined for 4% of all attackers (n = 51), 0% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Undetermined | 4% | 0% | 10% | 0%

• Attackers
• Demographics

cite page 95 Appendices

Arrests/charges: all 65%, employees 64%, customers 70%, partners/relatives 56%

Data Table 2 reports a history of arrests/charges for 65% of all attackers (n = 51), 64% of current or former employees (n = 22), 70% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 56% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Arrests/Charges** | 65% | 64% | 70% | 56%

• Attackers
• Criminal History

cite page 95 Appendices

Domestic violence arrests/charges: all 18%, employees 9%, customers 20%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports arrests/charges for domestic violence for 18% of all attackers (n = 51), 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 20% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Domestic Violence | 18% | 9% | 20% | 33%

• Criminal History
• Domestic Violence

cite page 95 Appendices

Sex crime arrests/charges: all 8%, employees 9%, customers 10%, partners/relatives 0%

Data Table 2 reports arrests/charges for sex crimes for 8% of all attackers (n = 51), 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Sex Crimes | 8% | 9% | 10% | 0%

• Criminal History

cite page 95 Appendices

Other violent crime arrests/charges: all 31%, employees 27%, customers 35%, partners 33%

Data Table 2 reports arrests/charges for other violent crimes for 31% of all attackers (n = 51), 27% of current or former employees (n = 22), 35% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Other Violent Crimes | 31% | 27% | 35% | 33%

• Criminal History

cite page 95 Appendices

Non-violent crime arrests/charges: all 57%, employees 55%, customers 65%, partners 44%

Data Table 2 reports arrests/charges for non-violent crimes for 57% of all attackers (n = 51), 55% of current or former employees (n = 22), 65% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Non-Violent Crimes | 57% | 55% | 65% | 44%

• Criminal History

cite page 95 Appendices

History of domestic violence: all 53%, employees 41%, customers 55%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 2 reports a history of domestic violence for 53% of all attackers (n = 51), 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 55% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**History of Domestic Violence*** | 53% | 41% | 55% | 78%

• Attackers
• Domestic Violence

cite page 95 Appendices

Mental health symptoms: all 59%, employees 64%, customers 55%, partners/relatives 56%

Data Table 2 reports mental health symptoms for 59% of all attackers (n = 51), 64% of current or former employees (n = 22), 55% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 56% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Mental Health Symptoms** | 59% | 64% | 55% | 56%

• Attackers
• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Known treatment/diagnosis: all 39%, employees 36%, customers 45%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports a known mental health treatment/diagnosis for 39% of all attackers (n = 51), 36% of current or former employees (n = 22), 45% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Known Treatment/Diagnosis | 39% | 36% | 45% | 33%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Psychosis: all 29%, employees 41%, customers 20%, partners/relatives 22%

Data Table 2 reports psychosis for 29% of all attackers (n = 51), 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 20% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 22% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Psychosis | 29% | 41% | 20% | 22%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Paranoia: all 22%, employees 41%, customers 5%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 2 reports paranoia (a sub-row of psychosis) for 22% of all attackers (n = 51), 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Paranoia | 22% | 41% | 5% | 11%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Delusions: all 12%, employees 23%, customers 0%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 2 reports delusions (a sub-row of psychosis) for 12% of all attackers (n = 51), 23% of current or former employees (n = 22), 0% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Delusions | 12% | 23% | 0% | 11%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Hallucinations: all 10%, employees 18%, customers 0%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 2 reports hallucinations (a sub-row of psychosis) for 10% of all attackers (n = 51), 18% of current or former employees (n = 22), 0% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Hallucinations | 10% | 18% | 0% | 11%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Depression: all 29%, employees 32%, customers 20%, partners/relatives 44%

Data Table 2 reports depression for 29% of all attackers (n = 51), 32% of current or former employees (n = 22), 20% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Depression | 29% | 32% | 20% | 44%

• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Suicidal ideations/attempts: all 18%, employees 14%, customers 15%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports suicidal ideations/attempts for 18% of all attackers (n = 51), 14% of current or former employees (n = 22), 15% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Suicidal Ideations/Attempts | 18% | 14% | 15% | 33%

• Desperation Despair
• Mental Health

cite page 95 Appendices

Stressors within 5 years: all 92%, employees 91%, customers 95%, partners/relatives 89%

Data Table 2 reports stressors within 5 years of the attack for 92% of all attackers (n = 51), 91% of current or former employees (n = 22), 95% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 89% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Stressors (within 5 years of attack)** | 92% | 91% | 95% | 89%

• Attackers
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Triggering event: all 43%, employees 32%, customers 60%, partners/relatives 33%

Data Table 2 reports a triggering event for 43% of all attackers (n = 51), 32% of current or former employees (n = 22), 60% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Triggering Event | 43% | 32% | 60% | 33%

• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Financial instability: all 55%, employees 59%, customers 55%, partners/relatives 44%

Data Table 2 reports financial instability for 55% of all attackers (n = 51), 59% of current or former employees (n = 22), 55% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Financial Instability | 55% | 59% | 55% | 44%

• Financial Stressors
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Personal stressors: all 47%, employees 50%, customers 45%, partners/relatives 44%

Data Table 2 reports personal stressors for 47% of all attackers (n = 51), 50% of current or former employees (n = 22), 45% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Personal Stressors | 47% | 50% | 45% | 44%

• Personal Stressors
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Romantic stressors: all 39%, employees 26%, customers 25%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 2 reports romantic stressors for 39% of all attackers (n = 51), 26% of current or former employees (n = 22), 25% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Romantic Stressors | 39% | 26% | 25% | 78%

• Personal Stressors
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Employment stressors: all 45%, employees 73%, customers 15%, partners/relatives 44%

Data Table 2 reports employment stressors for 45% of all attackers (n = 51), 73% of current or former employees (n = 22), 15% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Employment Stressors | 45% | 73% | 15% | 44%

• Employment Stressors
• Stressors

cite page 95 Appendices

Concerning communications: all 75%, employees 77%, customers 65%, partners/relatives 89%

Data Table 2 reports concerning communications by 75% of all attackers (n = 51), 77% of current or former employees (n = 22), 65% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 89% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Concerning Communications** | 75% | 77% | 65% | 89%

• Behaviors Of Concern
• Threats Communications

cite page 95 Appendices

History of making threats: all 47%, employees 41%, customers 40%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 2 reports a history of making threats for 47% of all attackers (n = 51), 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 40% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

History of Making Threats | 47% | 41% | 40% | 78%

• Threats Communications

cite page 95 Appendices

Threat specific to the target: all 31%, employees 32%, customers 25%, partners/relatives 56%

Data Table 2 reports a threat specific to the target by 31% of all attackers (n = 51), 32% of current or former employees (n = 22), 25% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 56% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Threat Specific to the Target | 31% | 32% | 25% | 56%

• Threats Communications

cite page 95 Appendices

Threat indicating imminence of attack: all 8%, employees 5%, customers 5%, partners 11%

Data Table 2 reports communications indicating imminence of attack by 8% of all attackers (n = 51), 5% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Indicating Imminence of Attack | 8% | 5% | 5% | 11%

• Leakage
• Threats Communications

cite page 95 Appendices

Elicited concern: all 78%, employees 82%, customers 75%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 2 reports that 78% of all attackers (n = 51) elicited concern, as did 82% of current or former employees (n = 22), 75% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Elicited Concern** | 78% | 82% | 75% | 78%

• Elicited Concern

cite page 95 Appendices

Elicited concern at work: all 24%, employees 41%, customers 10%, partners/relatives 11%

Data Table 2 reports that 24% of all attackers (n = 51) elicited concern at work, as did 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Elicited Concern at Work | 24% | 41% | 10% | 11%

• Current Former Employees
• Elicited Concern

cite page 95 Appendices

Elicited concern for safety: all 61%, employees 41%, customers 75%, partners/relatives 78%

Data Table 2 reports that 61% of all attackers (n = 51) elicited concern for safety, as did 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 75% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Elicited Concern for Safety | 61% | 41% | 75% | 78%

• Elicited Concern

cite page 95 Appendices

Victim of bullying/harassment: all 18%, employees 36%, customers 5%, partners/relatives 0%

Data Table 2 reports that 18% of all attackers (n = 51) were victims of bullying/harassment, as were 36% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Victim of | 18% | 36% | 5% | 0%

• Bullying Harassment

cite page 95 Appendices

Perpetrator of bullying/harassment: all 47%, employees 41%, customers 40%, partners 78%

Data Table 2 reports that 47% of all attackers (n = 51) were perpetrators of bullying/harassment, as were 41% of current or former employees (n = 22), 40% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 78% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

Perpetrator of | 47% | 41% | 40% | 78%

• Bullying Harassment

cite page 95 Appendices

Inappropriate interest in violence or weapons: all 10%, employees 9%, customers 10%, partners 11%

Data Table 2 reports an inappropriate interest in violence or weapons for 10% of all attackers (n = 51), 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Inappropriate Interest in Violence or Weapons** | 10% | 9% | 10% | 11%

• Behaviors Of Concern
• Fixations

cite page 95 Appendices

Behavior change: all 41%, employees 55%, customers 25%, partners/relatives 44%

Data Table 2 reports a behavior change for 41% of all attackers (n = 51), 55% of current or former employees (n = 22), 25% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 44% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).

Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9

**Behavior Change** | 41% | 55% | 25% | 44%

• Behavior Changes
• Behaviors Of Concern

cite page 95 Appendices