Employees need not be core members to matter to the BTAM process
Employees need not be core BTAM team members to be relevant to the BTAM process.
employees need not be core members of a BTAM team to be relevant to the BTAM process
NCIER®
Report page 47
Claims on this page
Ad hoc and other personnel can be critical to identifying and managing concern
Ad hoc participants and other personnel can be critically important when identifying, assessing, and managing individuals of concern.
ad hoc participants and other personnel within the organization can be critically important when identifying, assessing, and managing individuals of concern
Team should engage IT, cyber, chaplain, ombudsman, and labor relations as needed
The BTAM team should engage non-permanent personnel as needed to facilitate information sharing, especially during assessment and management.
the team should engage with these personnel as needed to facilitate information sharing, particularly during the assessment and management processes
BTAM team structures can be adapted to organizational needs
BTAM team structures and the departments involved can be adapted to the unique characteristics and needs of each organization.
these structures can be adapted to meet the unique characteristics and needs of an organization
Figure 7 example BTAM team with manager, security, HR, legal, and EAP seats
The body text on p.47 says Figure 7 shows one example in which a manager, a security official, an HR professional, and personnel from the legal department and EAP serve directly on the BTAM team; the team has no permanent representatives from IT, cybersecurity and insider threat, or the offices of the chaplain, ombudsman, or labor relations, but should engage them as needed.
In this example, a manager, a security official, an HR professional, and personnel from the legal department and EAP have representatives that serve directly on the
Why inferred The p.47 body text and the Figure 7 graphic disagree. Text: legal serves directly on the team and the ombudsman is not a permanent member. Figure: Ombudsman is a Core Member and Legal is an Ad Hoc Participant. This claim follows the body text.
Figure 7 is just one example of how an organization may staff a BTAM team
Figure 7 illustrates just one example of how an organization may staff a BTAM team and facilitate coordination across personnel and departments.
Figure 7 illustrates just one example of how an organization may staff a BTAM team and facilitate coordination across personnel and departments.
Why inferred Typed statement, not conjecture: the 'may'/'might'/'can' is permissive guidance (what a team may do), not speculation about what is the case.
Figure 7 core members (top): Human Resources, EAP, Security, Ombudsman
Figure 7 shows Human Resources, Employee Assistance Program, Security, and Ombudsman as core members seated along the top of the BTAM team table.
Top side (dark blue, Core Member): Human Resources; Employee Assistance Program; Security; Ombudsman
Figure 7 core member (left end): Management
Figure 7 shows Management as a core member at the left end of the BTAM team table.
Left end (dark blue, Core Member): Management
Figure 7 ad hoc participant (right end): Information Technology
Figure 7 shows Information Technology as an ad hoc participant at the right end of the BTAM team table.
Right end (gray, Ad Hoc Participant): Information Technology
Figure 7 ad hoc participants: Cybersecurity/Insider Threat, Chaplain, Labor Relations, Legal
Figure 7 shows Cybersecurity and Insider Threat, Chaplain, Labor Relations, and Legal as ad hoc participants along the bottom of the BTAM team table.
Bottom side (gray, Ad Hoc Participant): Cybersecurity and Insider Threat; Chaplain; Labor Relations; Legal
Top
Find the Perfect Training Class For You