No specific demographic profile of an attacker exists
NTAC research found there is no specific demographic profile of an attacker.
There is no specific demographic profile of an attacker.
23 claims on pp. 9–95 (fact 20, statement 2, conclusion 1).
NTAC research found there is no specific demographic profile of an attacker.
There is no specific demographic profile of an attacker.
All but one of the 50 incidents examined were perpetrated by a single attacker.
All but one of the 50 incidents examined were perpetrated by a single attacker.
Nearly all attackers were male (n = 49, 96%).
Sample (n = 49 of 51) · attackers, all affiliation types
Nearly all attackers were male (n = 49, 96%)
Attacker ages ranged from 22 to 66 years old.
ages ranged from 22 to 66 years old
The average age of workplace attackers was 41 years.
The average age of workplace attackers was 41 years.
All but one (n = 21, 95%) of the current or former employee attackers were male.
Sample (n = 21 of 22) · current or former employee attackers (22 attacks, each by a lone attacker)
All but one (n = 21, 95%) of the current or former employee attackers were male.
Ages of employee attackers ranged from 22 to 64 years old, and the average age was 40 years.
Ages ranged from 22 to 64 years old, and the average age was 40 years.
All but one customer, client, patient, or visitor who perpetrated an attack was male (n = 19, 95%).
Sample (n = 19 of 20) · customer, client, patient, and visitor attackers
All but one (n = 19, 95%) customer, client, patient, or visitor who perpetrated an attack were male
Ages ranged from 23 to 66 years old, and the average age was 41 years.
Ages ranged from 23 to 66 years old, and the average age was 41 years
All nine attackers in this group were male.
All nine attackers were male
Ages ranged from 27 to 58 years old, and the average age was 43 years.
Ages ranged from 27 to 58 years old, and the average age was 43 years
The findings show there is no specific demographic profile of the individuals who have carried out attacks targeting the workplace.
there is no specific demographic profile of the type of individuals who have carried out an attack targeting the workplace
Rather than focusing on demographic characteristics, the BTAM process prioritizes understanding an individual's thinking and behavior.
Rather than focusing on demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, age, race, ethnicity), the BTAM process prioritizes understanding an individual's thinking and behavior.
cite page 31 Part 2: A Guide for Workplace Violence Prevention
Data Table 2 (Attacker Data) reports gender, age range, race/ethnicity, arrests/charges, history of domestic violence, mental health symptoms, stressors, concerning communications, elicited concern, bullying/harassment, inappropriate interest in violence or weapons, and behavior change for all attackers (n = 51) and for current or former employees (n = 22), customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and romantic partners and relatives (n = 9). The column ns printed are 51 | 22 | 20 | 9.
ATTACKER DATA
Data Table 2 reports that 96% of all attackers (n = 51) were male, as were 95% of current or former employees (n = 22), 95% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 100% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Male | 96% | 95% | 95% | 100%
Data Table 2 reports that 2% of all attackers (n = 51) were female, as were 0% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Female | 2% | 0% | 5% | 0%
Data Table 2 reports an other gender for 2% of all attackers (n = 51), 5% of current or former employees (n = 22), 0% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Other | 2% | 5% | 0% | 0%
Data Table 2 gives an age range of 22-66 (41.0 average) for all attackers (n = 51), 22-64 (40.1 average) for current or former employees (n = 22), 23-66 (41.1 average) for customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 27-58 (42.9 average) for romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
**Age Range (average)** | 22-66 (41.0 avg) | 22-64 (40.1 avg) | 23-66 (41.1 avg) | 27-58 (42.9 avg)
Data Table 2 reports that 41% of all attackers (n = 51) were White (non-Hispanic/ethnicity unknown), as were 32% of current or former employees (n = 22), 55% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
White (non-Hispanic/ethnicity unknown) | 41% | 32% | 55% | 33%
Data Table 2 reports that 29% of all attackers (n = 51) were Black/African American, as were 50% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 22% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Black/African American | 29% | 50% | 10% | 22%
Data Table 2 reports that 14% of all attackers (n = 51) were Hispanic/Latino, as were 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 20% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 11% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Hispanic/Latino | 14% | 9% | 20% | 11%
Data Table 2 reports that 12% of all attackers (n = 51) were Asian, as were 9% of current or former employees (n = 22), 5% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 33% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Asian | 12% | 9% | 5% | 33%
Data Table 2 reports race/ethnicity as undetermined for 4% of all attackers (n = 51), 0% of current or former employees (n = 22), 10% of customers, clients, patients, and visitors (n = 20), and 0% of romantic partners and relatives (n = 9).
Sample (N = 51 | 22 | 20 | 9 by column) · Data Table 2 columns: all attackers 51 | employees 22 | customers, clients, patients, visitors 20 | partners and relatives 9
Undetermined | 4% | 0% | 10% | 0%
Find the Perfect Training Class For You