Appendix A gives basic frequency tabulations for the survey items analyzed in the report
In this appendix, we provide basic frequency tabulations for survey items included on the survey that we analyze in this report.
NCIER®
Appendix A: Survey Frequencies
Report pages 112–145: 629 claims on pp. 112–144 (fact 626, statement 1, definition 2).
Claims in this section
Items administered in eight modules; not all respondents received each module (A.1-A.65)
Our survey items were administered as part of eight different modules, and not all respondents received each module (Tables A.1–A.13 in Module 1; Tables A.14–A.19 in Module 2; Tables A.20–A.30 in Module 3; Tables A.31–A.32 in Module 4; Tables A.33–A.50 in Module 5; Tables A.51–A.57 in Module 6; Tables A.58–A.60 in Module 7; and Tables A.61–A.65 in Module 8).
All appendix estimates are weighted to represent national K–12 public school principals and their sc
All survey estimates presented below have been weighted to be representative of the national population of K–12 public school principals and the schools in which they serve.
Table A.1: No, 77.7 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
| No | 77.7 |
Table A.1: Yes, 22.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
| Yes | 22.3 |
Table A.1 note: Table A.1 note: N = 1,746.
NOTE: N = 1,746.
Table A.1 note: This question was taken from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackson
This question was taken from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackson et al., 2023).
Table A.2: No, 59.7 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
| No | 59.7 |
Table A.2: Yes, 40.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
No | 59.7 | | Yes | 40.3 |
Table A.2 note: Table A.2 note: n = 1,745.
NOTE: n = 1,745.
Table A.2 note: This question was taken from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackson
This question was taken from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackson et al., 2023).
Table A.3: 0, 33.5 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| 0 | 33.5 |
Table A.3: 1 to 4, 38.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| 1 to 4 | 38.0 |
Table A.3: 5 to 10, 15.2 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| 5 to 10 | 15.2 |
Table A.3: 11 to 20, 7.8 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| 11 to 20 | 7.8 |
Table A.3: 21 or more, 4.6 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| 21 or more | 4.6 |
Table A.3: Don’t know, 0.9 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1745) · Respondents answering Table A.3 (n = 1,745)
| Don’t know | 0.9 |
Table A.3 note: Table A.3 note: n = 1,745.
NOTE: n = 1,745.
Table A.3 note: According to the U.S. Department of Education’s definition, violent incidents includ
According to the U.S. Department of Education’s definition, violent incidents include rape or attempted rape, sexual assault other than rape, physical attacks or fights with or without a weapon, threat of physical attacks with or without a weapon, and robbery with or without a weapon (Burr et al., 2024, p. 3).
Table A.3 note: This question was adapted from NCES’s School Survey on Crime and Safety (Burr et al.
This question was adapted from NCES’s School Survey on Crime and Safety (Burr et al., 2024).
Table A.4: Very confident, 46.1 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
Very confident | 46.1
Table A.4: Confident, 38.9 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
| Confident | 38.9 |
Table A.4: Somewhat confident, 13.7 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
Somewhat confident | 13.7
Table A.4: Not confident, 1.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
Not confident | 1.3
Table A.4 note: Table A.4 note: N = 1,746.
NOTE: N = 1,746.
Table A.4 note: This question was adapted from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackso
This question was adapted from the American Teacher Panel Omnibus survey (see Jackson et al., 2023).
Table A.5: School counselor, 89.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
School counselor | 89.0
Table A.5: School nurse, 89.1 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
School nurse | 89.1
Table A.5: School social worker, 56.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
School social worker | 56.0
Table A.5: School psychologist, 67.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
School psychologist | 67.3
Table A.5: School resource officer/school-based law enforcement officer, 57.6 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
School resource officer/school-based law enforcement officer | 57.6
Table A.5: Non-law enforcement school security officer or guard, 22.1 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
Non-law enforcement school security officer or guard | 22.1
Table A.5: We do not have any of these types of staff members at our school, 0.8 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Tables A.4 and A.5 (N = 1,746)
We do not have any of these types of staff members at our school | 0.8
Table A.5 note: Table A.5 note: N = 1,746.
NOTE: N = 1,746.
Table A.5 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.6: No, 15.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Table A.6 (N = 1,746; screener question)
| No | 15.0 |
Table A.6: Yes, 82.2 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Table A.6 (N = 1,746; screener question)
No | 15.0 | | Yes | 82.2 |
Table A.6: Don’t know, 2.8 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1746) · Respondents answering Table A.6 (N = 1,746; screener question)
Yes | 82.2 | | Don’t know | 2.8 |
Table A.6 note: Table A.6 note: N = 1,746.
NOTE: N = 1,746.
Table A.6 note: Table A.6 was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey respo
This was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey respondents.
Table A.7: School level, 31.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
School level | 31.0
Table A.7: District level, 16.4 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
District level | 16.4
Table A.7: We have both school- and district-level teams, 52.2 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We have both school- and district-level teams | 52.2
Table A.7: Don’t know, 0.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We have both school- and district-level teams | 52.2 | | Don’t know | 0.3 |
Table A.7 note: Table A.7 note: n = 1,441.
NOTE: n = 1,441.
Table A.7 note: Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.7 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team saw
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team saw this question.
Table A.8: Not very familiar (e.g., you may have referred students, but are not extremely knowledgea
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Not very familiar (e.g., you may have referred students, but are not extremely knowledgeable about its processes) | 4.2
Table A.8: Somewhat familiar (e.g., you have referred students and/or have knowledge of the team’s p
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Somewhat familiar (e.g., you have referred students and/or have knowledge of the team’s processes) | 24.9
Table A.8: Extremely familiar (e.g., you are a member of the team or lead it, or otherwise have deta
Sample (N = 1441) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Extremely familiar (e.g., you are a member of the team or lead it, or otherwise have detailed knowledge) | 70.9
Table A.8 note: Table A.8 note: n = 1,441.
NOTE: n = 1,441.
Table A.8 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team saw
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team saw this question.
Table A.8 note: The question stem autofilled with “your school BTAM team” if respondents said they h
The question stem autofilled with “your school BTAM team” if respondents said they had a school-level BTAM team or that they have both school- and district-level teams.
Table A.8 note: The question stem autofilled with “your district BTAM team” if respondents said they
The question stem autofilled with “your district BTAM team” if respondents said they had a district-level BTAM team.
Table A.8 note: The question stem autofilled with “this BTAM team” if the respondent said they did n
The question stem autofilled with “this BTAM team” if the respondent said they did not know the level of the team.
Table A.9: No, 81.5 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1743) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
| No | 81.5 |
Table A.9: Yes, 9.1 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1743) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
No | 81.5 | | Yes | 9.1 |
Table A.9: Don’t know, 9.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 1743) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Yes | 9.1 | | Don’t know | 9.3 |
Table A.9 note: Table A.9 note: n = 1,743.
NOTE: n = 1,743.
Table A.9 note: Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.9 note: Table A.9 was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey respo
This was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey respondents.
Table A.10: A community- or county-level team that responds to cases in schools and in the broader c
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
A community- or county-level team that responds to cases in schools and in the broader community | 89.1
Table A.10: A state-level team that responds to cases as needed across the state, 5.4 weighted perce
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
A state-level team that responds to cases as needed across the state | 5.4
Table A.10: A team managed by a federal agency (e.g., FBI) that addresses referred cases, 2.2 weight
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
A team managed by a federal agency (e.g., FBI) that addresses referred cases | 2.2
Table A.10: A different type of team not specified here, 8.3 weighted percent
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
A different type of team not specified here | 8.3
Table A.10 note: Table A.10 note: n = 174.
NOTE: n = 174.
Table A.10 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.10 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by an outside BTAM team saw this q
Only respondents who said their school is served by an outside BTAM team saw this question.
Table A.11: Not very familiar, 27.6 weighted percent
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Not very familiar | 27.6
Table A.11: Somewhat familiar, 56.7 weighted percent
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Somewhat familiar | 56.7
Table A.11: Extremely familiar, 15.7 weighted percent
Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Extremely familiar | 15.7
Table A.11 note: Table A.11 note: n = 174.
NOTE: n = 174.
Table A.11 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by an outside BTAM team saw this q
Only respondents who said their school is served by an outside BTAM team saw this question.
Table A.12: No, 18.2 weighted percent
Sample (N = 305) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
| No | 18.2 |
Table A.12: Yes, 81.0 weighted percent
Sample (N = 305) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
No | 18.2 | | Yes | 81.0 |
Table A.12: Don’t know, 0.8 weighted percent
Sample (N = 305) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Yes | 81.0 | | Don’t know | 0.8 |
Table A.12 note: Table A.12 note: n = 305.
NOTE: n = 305.
Table A.12 note: This could be a team associated with a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) or pos
This could be a team associated with a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) or positive behavioral intervention system (PBIS) that makes decisions about individualized interventions for serious behavioral concerns.
Table A.12 note: Table A.12 was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey res
This was a screener question used to direct appropriate modules to survey respondents.
Table A.12 note: Only respondents who said their school does not have (or does not know that their s
Only respondents who said their school does not have (or does not know that their school has) a school- or district-level BTAM team saw this question.
Table A.13: Not very familiar: 11.7
Sample (N = 247) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Not very familiar (e.g., you may have referred students, but are not extremely knowledgeable about its processes) | 11.7
Table A.13: Somewhat familiar: 21.8
Sample (N = 247) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Somewhat familiar (e.g., you have referred students and/or have knowledge of the team’s processes) | 21.8
Table A.13: Extremely familiar: 66.5
Sample (N = 247) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Extremely familiar (e.g., you are a member of the team or lead it, or otherwise have detailed knowledge) | 66.5
Table A.13 note: n = 247. Only respondents who said their school has a school-based team that makes
n = 247. Only respondents who said their school has a school-based team that makes decisions regarding serious student behavioral concerns that is not referred to as a behavioral assessment and management (BTAM) team saw this question.
Table A.14 Elementary, Classroom/di…: A 57.8, B 20.2, C 1.9, D 13.2, E 25.1, F 18.7, G 13.6, H 8.3
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Classroom/direct contact teacher | 57.8 | 20.2 | 1.9 | 13.2 | 25.1 | 18.7 | 13.6 | 8.3
Table A.14 Elementary, School admin…: A 29.4, B 63.5, C 84.2, D 53.1, E 33.8, F 57.8, G 58.9, H 67.8
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School administrator (for example, principal or assistant principal) | 29.4 | 63.5 | 84.2 | 53.1 | 33.8 | 57.8 | 58.9 | 67.8
Table A.14 Elementary, School counselor: A 6.3, B 3.5, C 1.9, D 21.6, E 26.6, F 2.6, G 4.7, H 0.3
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School counselor[^a] | 6.3 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 21.6 | 26.6 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 0.3
Table A.14 Elementary, School nurse: A 0.0, B 0.0, C 0.0, D 0.0, E 0.0, F 0.0, G 0.0, H 0.0
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School nurse[^a] | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
Table A.14 Elementary, School social worker: A 0.5, B 0.3, C 0.0, D 4.1, E 6.3, F 0.4, G 1.9, H 0.7
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School social worker[^a] | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.7
Table A.14 Elementary, School psychologist: A 0.1, B 0.4, C 0.0, D 0.4, E 0.7, F 1.6, G 1.7, H 0.2
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School psychologist[^a] | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.2
Table A.14 Elementary, SRO or school-based…: A 0.0, B 0.1, C 0.5, D 0.0, E 0.8, F 0.0, G 0.0, H 3.1
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
SRO or school-based law enforcement officer[^a] | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.1
Table A.14 Elementary, Law enforcement: A 0.0, B 0.0, C 0.0, D 0.0, E 0.0, F 1.2, G 0.8, H 2.0
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Law enforcement (not school-based) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.0
Table A.14 Elementary, Non-law enforcement…: A 0.0, B 0.0, C 0.0, D 0.0, E 0.0, F 0.0, G 0.0, H 0.1
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Non-law enforcement security officer or guard[^a] | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1
Table A.14 Elementary, School- or distri…: A 0.3, B 2.6, C 4.2, D 3.9, E 4.8, F 15.3, G 11.8, H 14.6
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School- or district-level multi-person BTAM team[^a] | 0.3 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 15.3 | 11.8 | 14.6
Table A.14 Elementary, Outside BTAM team se…: A 0.0, B 0.0, C 0.0, D 0.0, E 0.0, F 0.0, G 0.0, H 0.0
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Outside BTAM team serving our school[^a] | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
Table A.14 Elementary, MTSS, PBIS, or othe…: A 3.4, B 8.5, C 1.1, D 3.1, E 0.8, F 2.4, G 4.2, H 1.6
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
MTSS, PBIS, or other behavioral support team[^a] | 3.4 | 8.5 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 1.6
Table A.14 Elementary, Other: A 2.1, B 0.7, C 6.1, D 0.8, E 1.1, F 0.0, G 2.3, H 1.3
Sample (N = 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687 by column) · Table A.14 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Other (please specify) | 2.1 | 0.7 | 6.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 1.3
Table A.14 Elementary: N by scenario: A 353, B 335, C 131, D 148, E 137, F 137, G 133, H 687
N | 353 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 137 | 137 | 133 | 687
Table A.14 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.14 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.14 note: This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or distric
This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Footnote a (p. 97): response option shown only to respondents whose school had such staff
Respondents saw this response option only if they indicated previously that their school had such staff.
Table A.15 Secondary, Classroom/direct…: I 55.6, J 5.1, K 50.8, L 15.3, M 11.1, N 17.8, O 0.3, P 1.3
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Classroom/direct contact teacher | 55.6 | 5.1 | 50.8 | 15.3 | 11.1 | 17.8 | 0.3 | 1.3
Table A.15 Secondary, School admin…: I 23.0, J 85.1, K 35.4, L 76.5, M 80.3, N 44.0, O 58.1, P 77.1
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School administrator (for example, principal or assistant principal) | 23.0 | 85.1 | 35.4 | 76.5 | 80.3 | 44.0 | 58.1 | 77.1
Table A.15 Secondary, School counselor: I 8.8, J 3.9, K 9.3, L 0.0, M 0.9, N 21.9, O 11.3, P 0.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School counselor[^a] | 8.8 | 3.9 | 9.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 21.9 | 11.3 | 0.8
Table A.15 Secondary, School nurse: I 0.0, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.6, N 0.0, O 0.0, P 0.0
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School nurse[^a] | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
Table A.15 Secondary, School social worker: I 0.4, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.0, N 2.1, O 3.0, P 0.0
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School social worker[^a] | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 0.0
Table A.15 Secondary, School psychologist: I 0.1, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.0, N 1.1, O 0.0, P 0.0
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School psychologist[^a] | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0
Table A.15 Secondary, SRO or school-based…: I 0.1, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.6, M 0.0, N 0.0, O 6.3, P 4.5
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
SRO or school-based law enforcement officer[^a] | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 4.5
Table A.15 Secondary, Law enforcement: I 0.0, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.0, N 0.0, O 4.9, P 1.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Law enforcement (not school-based) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 1.8
Table A.15 Secondary, Non-law enforcement…: I 0.2, J 1.7, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.0, N 0.0, O 0.0, P 0.5
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Non-law enforcement security officer or guard[^a] | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5
Table A.15 Secondary, School- or distri…: I 1.0, J 1.7, K 0.5, L 4.0, M 2.3, N 11.9, O 12.8, P 11.9
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
School- or district-level multi-person BTAM team[^a] | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 11.9 | 12.8 | 11.9
Table A.15 Secondary, Outside BTAM team se…: I 0.0, J 0.0, K 0.0, L 0.0, M 0.0, N 0.0, O 0.0, P 0.1
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Outside BTAM team serving our school[^a] | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1
Table A.15 Secondary, MTSS, PBIS, or othe…: I 9.7, J 0.5, K 3.7, L 2.4, M 3.2, N 1.2, O 0.9, P 0.3
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
MTSS, PBIS, or other behavioral support team[^a] | 9.7 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3
Table A.15 Secondary, Other: I 1.1, J 1.9, K 0.4, L 1.3, M 1.6, N 0.0, O 2.5, P 1.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734 by column) · Table A.15 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Other (please specify) | 1.1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 1.8
Table A.15 Secondary: N by scenario: I 734, J 139, K 128, L 103, M 134, N 126, O 107, P 734
N | 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 107 | 734
Table A.15 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.15 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.15 note: This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or distric
This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Footnote a (p. 98): response option shown only to respondents whose school had such staff
Respondents saw this response option only if they indicated previously that their school had such staff.
Table A.16 Elementary, Warning or…: A 86.4, B 48.0, C 33.2, D 54.0, E 37.8, F 40.2, G 55.0, H 23.1
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Warning or verbal correction of behavior | 86.4 | 48.0 | 33.2 | 54.0 | 37.8 | 40.2 | 55.0 | 23.1
Table A.16 Elementary, Disciplinary…: A 67.7, B 78.4, C 73.5, D 59.7, E 23.9, F 78.5, G 71.3, H 69.8
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Disciplinary measures (for example, in-school detention; removal of privileges) | 67.7 | 78.4 | 73.5 | 59.7 | 23.9 | 78.5 | 71.3 | 69.8
Table A.16 Elementary, Parent co…: A 86.0, B 83.7, C 87.8, D 88.8, E 90.4, F 92.8, G 90.9, H 85.3
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Parent consultation or home visit | 86.0 | 83.7 | 87.8 | 88.8 | 90.4 | 92.8 | 90.9 | 85.3
Table A.16 Elementary, Warning to n…: A 5.9, B 20.4, C 19.1, D 44.0, E 24.8, F 36.8, G 46.1, H 61.7
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Warning to named targets or victims of threats and safety planning to protect targets/victims | 5.9 | 20.4 | 19.1 | 44.0 | 24.8 | 36.8 | 46.1 | 61.7
Table A.16 Elementary, Behaviora…: A 17.1, B 29.3, C 18.6, D 18.8, E 21.8, F 31.8, G 47.4, H 45.2
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Behavioral or movement controls (for example, changes to arrival time or passing times) | 17.1 | 29.3 | 18.6 | 18.8 | 21.8 | 31.8 | 47.4 | 45.2
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 43.0, B 50.0, C 27.6, D 59.1, E 64.6, F 63.1, G 63.3, H 51.8
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start programming to help the student build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins; adult mentoring) | 43.0 | 50.0 | 27.6 | 59.1 | 64.6 | 63.1 | 63.3 | 51.8
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 42.4, B 51.7, C 23.6, D 46.2, E 47.6, F 57.4, G 53.4, H 40.6
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start skill-building services (e.g., social skills- or leadership skills-building program) | 42.4 | 51.7 | 23.6 | 46.2 | 47.6 | 57.4 | 53.4 | 40.6
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 27.6, B 42.0, C 20.3, D 49.2, E 42.6, F 31.6, G 44.9, H 40.0
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start programming to help the student build peer relationships and engagement (for example, friend or peer mentor groups) | 27.6 | 42.0 | 20.3 | 49.2 | 42.6 | 31.6 | 44.9 | 40.0
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need fo…: A 11.3, B 9.4, C 2.1, D 15.4, E 7.9, F 14.9, G 4.5, H 8.8
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start individualized academic or vocational programming | 11.3 | 9.4 | 2.1 | 15.4 | 7.9 | 14.9 | 4.5 | 8.8
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need…: A 22.6, B 30.7, C 3.5, D 13.0, E 7.7, F 22.8, G 14.8, H 13.5
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start special education or disability supports | 22.6 | 30.7 | 3.5 | 13.0 | 7.7 | 22.8 | 14.8 | 13.5
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 33.3, B 45.7, C 43.4, D 62.7, E 77.1, F 65.1, G 71.7, H 70.1
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start mental health counseling or care | 33.3 | 45.7 | 43.4 | 62.7 | 77.1 | 65.1 | 71.7 | 70.1
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need for…: A 2.2, B 2.8, C 71.3, D 4.7, E 4.0, F 4.8, G 0.8, H 4.2
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start substance use treatment | 2.2 | 2.8 | 71.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 4.2
Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 14.3, B 26.9, C 39.6, D 27.5, E 52.0, F 40.7, G 46.3, H 45.8
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start family support and intervention programming for the student and their family | 14.3 | 26.9 | 39.6 | 27.5 | 52.0 | 40.7 | 46.3 | 45.8
Table A.16 Elementary, Temporary…: A 11.3, B 29.7, C 31.7, D 20.8, E 15.6, F 44.9, G 29.5, H 70.4
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 11.3 | 29.7 | 31.7 | 20.8 | 15.6 | 44.9 | 29.5 | 70.4
Table A.16 Elementary, Law enforcemen…: A 3.0, B 3.1, C 15.2, D 3.5, E 9.1, F 22.4, G 17.5, H 41.1
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Law enforcement action (for example, arrest), civil or criminal legal proceedings | 3.0 | 3.1 | 15.2 | 3.5 | 9.1 | 22.4 | 17.5 | 41.1
Table A.16 Elementary, Permanent removal…: A 1.6, B 2.2, C 1.0, D 2.5, E 0.0, F 6.8, G 5.0, H 15.0
Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Permanent removal from school (expulsion, transfer to an alternative school) | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 15.0
Table A.16 Elementary: N by scenario: A 351, B 335, C 131, D 148, E 136, F 137, G 133, H 686
N | 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686
Table A.16 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.16 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.16 note: This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or distric
This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Table A.17 Secondary, Warning or…: I 72.5, J 25.5, K 85.5, L 34.9, M 41.7, N 32.5, O 15.4, P 18.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Warning or verbal correction of behavior | 72.5 | 25.5 | 85.5 | 34.9 | 41.7 | 32.5 | 15.4 | 18.8
Table A.17 Secondary, Disciplinary…: I 59.8, J 79.1, K 52.9, L 74.6, M 87.3, N 32.3, O 36.0, P 67.7
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Disciplinary measures (for example, in-school detention; removal of privileges) | 59.8 | 79.1 | 52.9 | 74.6 | 87.3 | 32.3 | 36.0 | 67.7
Table A.17 Secondary, Parent consul…: I 83.4, J 92.1, K 67.1, L 80.7, M 87.1, N 89.4, O 88.1, P 87.5
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Parent consultation or home visit | 83.4 | 92.1 | 67.1 | 80.7 | 87.1 | 89.4 | 88.1 | 87.5
Table A.17 Secondary, Warning to named…: I 7.3, J 9.8, K 18.1, L 9.5, M 13.1, N 24.1, O 46.8, P 57.7
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Warning to named targets or victims of threats and safety planning to protect targets/victims | 7.3 | 9.8 | 18.1 | 9.5 | 13.1 | 24.1 | 46.8 | 57.7
Table A.17 Secondary, Behavioral or…: I 11.2, J 34.2, K 18.1, L 11.6, M 26.8, N 28.6, O 34.9, P 56.3
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Behavioral or movement controls (for example, changes to arrival time or passing times) | 11.2 | 34.2 | 18.1 | 11.6 | 26.8 | 28.6 | 34.9 | 56.3
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 30.3, J 47.3, K 24.4, L 16.5, M 48.4, N 61.1, O 58.3, P 44.0
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start programming to help the student build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins; adult mentoring) | 30.3 | 47.3 | 24.4 | 16.5 | 48.4 | 61.1 | 58.3 | 44.0
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 25.8, J 25.8, K 18.7, L 12.2, M 36.1, N 44.2, O 33.4, P 31.0
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start skill-building services (e.g., social skills- or leadership skills-building program) | 25.8 | 25.8 | 18.7 | 12.2 | 36.1 | 44.2 | 33.4 | 31.0
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 16.4, J 21.3, K 23.1, L 12.4, M 20.4, N 46.4, O 31.5, P 32.4
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start programming to help the student build peer relationships and engagement (for example, friend or peer mentor groups) | 16.4 | 21.3 | 23.1 | 12.4 | 20.4 | 46.4 | 31.5 | 32.4
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for or…: I 37.2, J 9.9, K 2.2, L 1.8, M 8.3, N 11.5, O 12.0, P 8.2
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start individualized academic or vocational programming | 37.2 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 8.2
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 33.7, J 8.0, K 2.3, L 3.7, M 29.2, N 13.9, O 14.2, P 12.7
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start special education or disability supports | 33.7 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 29.2 | 13.9 | 14.2 | 12.7
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 21.4, J 68.1, K 18.2, L 20.8, M 56.1, N 81.9, O 70.6, P 61.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start mental health counseling or care | 21.4 | 68.1 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 56.1 | 81.9 | 70.6 | 61.8
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 4.1, J 68.1, K 2.0, L 4.6, M 6.5, N 13.4, O 16.0, P 8.8
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start substance use treatment | 4.1 | 68.1 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 13.4 | 16.0 | 8.8
Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need fo…: I 12.3, J 40.9, K 4.5, L 12.3, M 27.3, N 49.6, O 46.0, P 37.6
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Assess need for or start family support and intervention programming for the student and their family | 12.3 | 40.9 | 4.5 | 12.3 | 27.3 | 49.6 | 46.0 | 37.6
Table A.17 Secondary, Temporary rem…: I 7.9, J 60.3, K 9.2, L 56.1, M 48.0, N 26.6, O 51.7, P 72.9
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 7.9 | 60.3 | 9.2 | 56.1 | 48.0 | 26.6 | 51.7 | 72.9
Table A.17 Secondary, Law enforcemen…: I 4.7, J 32.4, K 3.8, L 26.4, M 12.8, N 25.4, O 51.7, P 52.7
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Law enforcement action (for example, arrest), civil or criminal legal proceedings | 4.7 | 32.4 | 3.8 | 26.4 | 12.8 | 25.4 | 51.7 | 52.7
Table A.17 Secondary, Permanent rem…: I 3.0, J 12.2, K 3.3, L 11.1, M 8.2, N 12.0, O 23.9, P 18.6
Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team
Permanent removal from school (expulsion, transfer to an alternative school) | 3.0 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 11.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 23.9 | 18.6
Table A.17 Secondary: N by scenario: I 734, J 139, K 128, L 103, M 134, N 126, O 105, P 733
N | 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733
Table A.17 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.17 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.17 note: Includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTA
Includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Table A.18 Elementary, No: A 72.8, B 45.4, C 44.8, D 22.2, E 15.0, F 8.6, G 13.4, H 4.7
Sample (N = 350 | 326 | 126 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 119 | 589 by column) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team whose multi-person team would not make the initial decision (Table A.18 scenario columns A-H)
No | 72.8 | 45.4 | 44.8 | 22.2 | 15.0 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 4.7
Table A.18 Elementary, Yes: A 27.2, B 54.6, C 55.2, D 77.8, E 85.0, F 91.4, G 86.6, H 95.3
Sample (N = 350 | 326 | 126 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 119 | 589 by column) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team whose multi-person team would not make the initial decision (Table A.18 scenario columns A-H)
Yes | 27.2 | 54.6 | 55.2 | 77.8 | 85.0 | 91.4 | 86.6 | 95.3
Table A.18 Elementary: N by scenario: A 350, B 326, C 126, D 142, E 130, F 114, G 119, H 589
N | 350 | 326 | 126 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 119 | 589
Table A.18 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.18 note: This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or distric
This table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Table A.18 note: Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team wo
Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team would not make the initial decision about how to respond to a student’s behavior saw this question.
Table A.19 No (secondary): I 74.2, J 37.3, K 72.2, L 24.7, M 31.3, N 6.3, O 6.1, P 5.1
Sample (N = 727 | 138 | 127 | 101 | 131 | 110 | 92 | 646 by column) · Table A.19 columns: scenarios I through P (secondary), in column order
No | 74.2 | 37.3 | 72.2 | 24.7 | 31.3 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 5.1
Table A.19 Yes (secondary): I 25.8, J 62.7, K 27.8, L 75.3, M 68.7, N 93.7, O 93.9, P 94.9
Sample (N = 727 | 138 | 127 | 101 | 131 | 110 | 92 | 646 by column) · Table A.19 columns: scenarios I through P (secondary), in column order
Yes | 25.8 | 62.7 | 27.8 | 75.3 | 68.7 | 93.7 | 93.9 | 94.9
Table A.19 N by scenario: I 727, J 138, K 127, L 101, M 131, N 110, O 92, P 646
N | 727 | 138 | 127 | 101 | 131 | 110 | 92 | 646
Table A.19 note: Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Principals were randomly assigned specific scenarios (see Appendix B).
Table A.19 note: Table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-...
Table includes only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team.
Table A.19 note: Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school- or district-level multi-person BTAM team would not make the initial decision about how to respond to a student’s behavior saw this question.
Module routing: respondents with a BTAM team or other school-based team received it
Respondents who indicated that their school had a school- or district-level BTAM team (or another school-based team that makes decisions regarding serious student behavioral concerns that is not referred to as a BTAM team) received this module.
Official-BTAM-team respondents told to answer from knowledge of their team
At the beginning of the module, respondents that indicated they had an official BTAM team received the following instructions, “You indicated that your [AUTOFILL] has a BTAM team. Please answer the following questions based on your knowledge of that team.”
Instructions autofilled with "school" for school-level or both-level teams
The instructions autofilled with “school” if respondents said that they had a school level BTAM team or that they had both school- and district-level teams.
Instructions autofilled with "district" for district-level teams
The instructions autofilled with “district” if respondents said that they had a district-level BTAM team.
Question stem autofilled "school or district" if team level unknown
The question stem autofilled with “school or district” if the respondent said that they did not know the level of the team.
Unofficial-team respondents told to answer about their team's practices
Respondents who indicated they had an unofficial BTAM team received the following instructions: “You indicated your school has a school-based team that makes decisions regarding student behavioral and other concerns. This team is not explicitly considered a behavioral threat assessment and management team. Please answer the following questions based on your knowledge of that team’s practices (although the questions will refer to it as a BTAM team).”
Table A.20 0 to 1 school year(s): 12.3 (official + other teams); 12.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.20 columns: official BTAM teams and other school-based teams; official BTAM teams only
0 to 1 school year(s) (newly implemented) | 12.3 | 12.2
Table A.20 2 to 4 school years: 48.3 (official + other teams); 51.1 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.20 columns: official BTAM teams and other school-based teams; official BTAM teams only
2 to 4 school years | 48.3 | 51.1
Table A.20 5 to 8 school years: 19.4 (official + other teams); 19.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.20 columns: official BTAM teams and other school-based teams; official BTAM teams only
5 to 8 school years | 19.4 | 19.2
Table A.20 9 or more school years: 10.9 (official + other teams); 9.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.20 columns: official BTAM teams and other school-based teams; official BTAM teams only
9 or more school years | 10.9 | 9.7
Table A.20 Don’t know: 9.0 (official + other teams); 7.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.20 columns: official BTAM teams and other school-based teams; official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 9.0 | 7.7
Table A.20 N: 1,646 (official + other teams); 1,408 (official only)
N | 1,646 | 1,408
Table A.20 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.20 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.21 You (school leader): 84.5 (official + other teams); 84.0 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
You (school leader) | 84.5 | 84.0
Table A.21 District administrators: 33.6 (official + other teams); 36.4 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
District administrators | 33.6 | 36.4
Table A.21 Other school administrators besides you: 66.7 (official + other teams); 68.7 (official...
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Other school administrators besides you (for example, assistant principal, other senior administrator) | 66.7 | 68.7
Table A.21 School-based law enforcement: 47.6 (official + other teams); 52.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
School-based law enforcement (for example, school resource officer) | 47.6 | 52.6
Table A.21 Non-school-based law enforcement: 12.5 (official + other teams); 13.3 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Non-school-based law enforcement (for example, police officer from local department who is not regularly in the school) | 12.5 | 13.3
Table A.21 Psychologist, whether school-based or external: 46.8 (official + other teams); 48.5 (o...
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Psychologist, whether school-based or external | 46.8 | 48.5
Table A.21 Counselor, whether school-based or external: 82.4 (official + other teams); 84.2 (offi...
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Counselor, whether school-based or external | 82.4 | 84.2
Table A.21 Social worker, whether school-based or external: 48.2 (official + other teams); 50.2 (...
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Social worker, whether school-based or external | 48.2 | 50.2
Table A.21 General instructional staff: 47.5 (official + other teams); 45.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
General instructional staff (for example, teacher) | 47.5 | 45.2
Table A.21 Special education specialist: 44.4 (official + other teams); 42.5 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Special education specialist | 44.4 | 42.5
Table A.21 Other (please specify): 13.7 (official + other teams); 13.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Other (please specify) | 13.7 | 13.6
Table A.21 None of these personnel are members: 0.4 (official + other teams); 0.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 1646 | 1408 by column) · Table A.21 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
None of these personnel are members | 0.4 | 0.2
Table A.21 N: 1,646 (official + other teams); 1,408 (official only)
N | 1,646 | 1,408 |
Table A.21 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.21 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.22 LE provides public safety perspective: 57.8 (official + other teams); 57.5 (official o...
Sample (N = 914 | 854 by column) · Table A.22 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Law enforcement provides a public safety perspective about school dynamics and student behavior to help assess and manage behavioral concerns | 57.8 | 57.5
Table A.22 LE provides police/court records information: 17.5 (official + other teams); 17.5 (off...
Sample (N = 914 | 854 by column) · Table A.22 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Law enforcement provides information from police and court records so the team can understand past student behavior | 17.5 | 17.5
Table A.22 LE helps decide safety/security actions: 64.3 (official + other teams); 64.3 (official...
Sample (N = 914 | 854 by column) · Table A.22 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Law enforcement helps with decisions about when safety- and security-related actions are necessary (e.g., searching student belongings, implementing schoolwide lock down) | 64.3 | 64.3
Table A.22 LE consults on legal repercussions: 18.9 (official + other teams); 18.8 (official only)
Sample (N = 914 | 854 by column) · Table A.22 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Law enforcement consults on the potential legal repercussions of student behavior | 18.9 | 18.8
Table A.22 LE initiates public safety responses: 32.4 (official + other teams); 33.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 914 | 854 by column) · Table A.22 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Law enforcement participates to initiate public safety responses when necessary (e.g., arrest or other criminal justice intervention) | 32.4 | 33.2
Table A.22 N: 914 (official + other teams); 854 (official only)
N | 914 | 854 |
Table A.22 note: Respondents were instructed to select up to two responses that best capture law ...
Respondents were instructed to select up to two responses that best capture law enforcement’s most important roles on the team.
Table A.22 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that this team includes school-based or non-school-based law enforcement saw this question.
Table A.23 Very ineffective: 4.9 (official + other teams); 4.9 (official only)
Sample (N = 1644 | 1406 by column) · Table A.23 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Very ineffective | 4.9 | 4.9
Table A.23 Somewhat ineffective: 5.3 (official + other teams); 4.9 (official only)
Sample (N = 1644 | 1406 by column) · Table A.23 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Somewhat ineffective | 5.3 | 4.9
Table A.23 Somewhat effective: 38.8 (official + other teams); 37.3 (official only)
Sample (N = 1644 | 1406 by column) · Table A.23 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Somewhat effective | 38.8 | 37.3
Table A.23 Very effective: 48.3 (official + other teams); 50.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 1644 | 1406 by column) · Table A.23 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Very effective | 48.3 | 50.7
Table A.23 Don’t know: 2.7 (official + other teams); 2.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 1644 | 1406 by column) · Table A.23 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 2.7 | 2.2
Table A.23 N: 1,644 (official + other teams); 1,406 (official only)
N | 1,644 | 1,406 |
Table A.23 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.24 Salem-Kaiser: 1.8 (official + other teams); 2.0 (official only)
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Salem-Kaiser | 1.8 | 2.0
Table A.24 USSS NTAC (U.S. Secret Service/National Threat Assessment Center): 4.0 (official + oth...
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
USSS NTAC (U.S. Secret Service/National Threat Assessment Center) | 4.0 | 4.6
Table A.24 V/CSTAG (Virginia/Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines): 7.5 (official + ...
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
V/CSTAG (Virginia/Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines) | 7.5 | 8.5
Table A.24 VA DCJS (Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services): 1.2 (official + other team...
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
VA DCJS (Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services) | 1.2 | 1.4
Table A.24 VTRA (Violence Threat Risk Assessment): 3.2 (official + other teams); 3.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
VTRA (Violence Threat Risk Assessment) | 3.2 | 3.6
Table A.24 Named program not listed (please specify): 10.2 (official + other teams); 10.6 (offici...
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We use a named program not included here (please specify): | 10.2 | 10.6
Table A.24 Locally developed BTAM program: 27.4 (official + other teams); 30.1 (official only)
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We use a BTAM program developed locally, drawing on other models and resources to craft a process for our specific school or school district | 27.4 | 30.1
Table A.24 No defined program used: 24.0 (official + other teams); 17.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We do not use a defined program as part of our BTAM process | 24.0 | 17.6
Table A.24 Don’t know: 20.7 (official + other teams); 21.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 1640 | 1404 by column) · Table A.24 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 20.7 | 21.6
Table A.24 N: 1,640 (official + other teams); 1,404 (official only)
N | 1,640 | 1,404 |
Table A.24 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.25 0 to 1 school year(s): 13.0 (official + other teams); 12.8 (official only)
Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
0 to 1 school year(s) (newly implemented) | 13.0 | 12.8
Table A.25 2 to 4 school years: 52.9 (official + other teams); 53.8 (official only)
Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
2 to 4 school years | 52.9 | 53.8
Table A.25 5 to 8 school years: 21.4 (official + other teams); 21.5 (official only)
Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
5 to 8 school years | 21.4 | 21.5
Table A.25 9 to 12 school years: 6.5 (official + other teams); 5.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
9 to 12 school years | 6.5 | 5.7
Table A.25 Don’t know: 6.2 (official + other teams); 6.2 (official only)
Sample (N = 919 | 867 by column) · Table A.25 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 6.2 | 6.2
Table A.25 N: 919 (official + other teams); 867 (official only)
N | 919 | 867 |
Table A.25 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model saw this question.
Table A.25 note: The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the questio...
The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the question about what specific BTAM program they were using.
Table A.26 Implemented as originally designed: 47.4 (official + other teams); 47.3 (official only)
Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We have implemented the program as it was originally designed and specified by the developers | 47.4 | 47.3
Table A.26 Changed form, kept core functions: 33.0 (official + other teams); 32.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We have made changes to the program’s form (e.g., related to materials, staffing, specification of protocols, etc.), while maintaining its core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 33.0 | 32.7
Table A.26 Changed core functions: 1.3 (official + other teams); 1.3 (official only)
Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We have made changes that directly modified the program’s core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 1.3 | 1.3
Table A.26 I don’t know if we have made changes: 18.3 (official + other teams); 18.7 (official only)
Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
I don’t know if we have made changes | 18.3 | 18.7
Table A.26 N: 468 (official + other teams); 445 (official only)
N | 468 | 445 |
Table A.26 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed or (2) an “Other” model saw this question.
Table A.26 note: The question stem was auto-filled based on the respondent’s answer to the questi...
The question stem was auto-filled based on the respondent’s answer to the question about what specific BTAM program they were using.
Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (resource/staff constraints): 39.5 (official + other tea...
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to resource or staff constraints | 39.5 | 40.4
Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (community concerns/context): 6.5 (official + other team...
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to community concerns or context | 6.5 | 5.3
Table A.27 Added personnel beyond recommended: 29.2 (official + other teams); 29.6 (official only)
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We added personnel to our team beyond the recommended personnel | 29.2 | 29.6
Table A.27: We changed the program’s recommended procedures for collecting informatio… - 10.7 / 10.7
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We changed the program’s recommended procedures for collecting information to assess threats | 10.7 | 10.7
Table A.27: We adjusted the types of data used to assess threats because we were unab… - 16.5 / 16.0
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We adjusted the types of data used to assess threats because we were unable to access or use some types of data recommended by the program | 16.5 | 16.0
Table A.27: We use additional data to assess threats and concerning student behavior… - 25.1 / 25.8
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We use additional data to assess threats and concerning student behavior beyond what the program recommends, in addition to using the data recommended by the program | 25.1 | 25.8
Table A.27: We modified (or don’t use) worksheets, checklists or other tools that com… - 34.4 / 35.1
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We modified (or don’t use) worksheets, checklists or other tools that come with the program | 34.4 | 35.1
Table A.27: We created worksheets, checklists or other tools that didn’t originally c… - 25.2 / 23.3
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We created worksheets, checklists or other tools that didn’t originally come with the program | 25.2 | 23.3
Table A.27: We changed the way the program recommends assessing whether a student poses… - 3.1 / 3.3
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We changed the way the program recommends assessing whether a student poses a threat to themselves or others | 3.1 | 3.3
Table A.27: We don’t use some of the intervention options recommended by the program… - 17.4 / 17.4
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We don’t use some of the intervention options recommended by the program because of access issues or resource constraints | 17.4 | 17.4
Table A.27: We added intervention options beyond those recommended by the program to… - 21.1 / 20.8
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
We added intervention options beyond those recommended by the program to meet our local needs | 21.1 | 20.8
Table A.27: Other changes (please specify): - 3.5 / 3.2
Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)
Other changes (please specify): | 3.5 | 3.2
Table A.27: N - 162 / 153
N | 162 | 153 NOTE: Respondent
Table A.27 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.27 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions), that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed or (2) an “Other” model saw this question, and that said their school has made changes to the model saw this question.
Table A.27 note: The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the qu
The question stem was autofilled based on the respondent’s answer to the question about what specific BTAM program they were using.
Table A.28: No - 49.5 / 49.0
Sample (N = 918 | 866 by column) · Table A.28 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
No | 49.5 | 49.0
Table A.28: Yes - 50.5 / 51.0
Sample (N = 918 | 866 by column) · Table A.28 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Yes | 50.5 | 51.0
Table A.28: N - 918 / 866
N | 918 | 866 NOTE: Only respo
Table A.28 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model saw this question.
Table A.29: N/A; None of these were main drivers - 2.7 / 2.0
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
N/A; None of these were main drivers | 2.7 | 2.0
Table A.29: We had a violent incident in our school or district and we implemented the… - 5.3 / 5.4
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We had a violent incident in our school or district and we implemented the program as part of our response | 5.3 | 5.4
Table A.29: We were required to by state or local law - 42.8 / 44.3
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We were required to by state or local law | 42.8 | 44.3
Table A.29: We were required to by school district policy - 41.7 / 42.7
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We were required to by school district policy | 41.7 | 42.7
Table A.29: We had concerns about being held liable in cases of school violence - 10.2 / 10.8
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We had concerns about being held liable in cases of school violence | 10.2 | 10.8
Table A.29: Behavioral assessment and management is a best practice for violence prev… - 58.2 / 59.1
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Behavioral assessment and management is a best practice for violence prevention | 58.2 | 59.1
Table A.29: Our school community wanted us to have a BTAM program - 5.2 / 5.2
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school community wanted us to have a BTAM program | 5.2 | 5.2
Table A.29: Other organizations we depend on (e.g., our local law enforcement departmen… - 8.3 / 8.2
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Other organizations we depend on (e.g., our local law enforcement department) encouraged us to adopt a BTAM program | 8.3 | 8.2
Table A.29: Other (please specify) - 7.6 / 7.0
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Other (please specify) | 7.6 | 7.0
Table A.29: Don’t know - 2.8 / 3.0
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.29 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 2.8 | 3.0
Table A.29: N - 475 / 452
N | 475 | 452 NOTE: Respondent
Table A.29 note: Respondents were instructed to select up to three responses.
Respondents were instructed to select up to three responses.
Table A.29 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions); that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model; and that said they were around for the initial implementation of this model saw this question.
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with school staff - 32.2 / 31.1
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with school staff | 32.2 | 31.1
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with students, pare… - 17.5 / 17.1
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with students, parents, and/or the larger school community | 17.5 | 17.1
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators estimated funding and other resourc… - 18.5 / 17.5
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators estimated funding and other resource levels necessary to implement the program and ensured they were available | 18.5 | 17.5
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators consulted with our local law enforc… - 41.0 / 42.5
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators consulted with our local law enforcement organization | 41.0 | 42.5
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators inventoried what intervention progr… - 30.9 / 31.3
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators inventoried what intervention programs we had available | 30.9 | 31.3
Table A.30: Our school or district administrators identified and discussed participat… - 33.8 / 34.3
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our school or district administrators identified and discussed participation in BTAM with relevant community and service provider organizations (e.g., mental health providers, social service agencies, non-governmental service providers) | 33.8 | 34.3
Table A.30: I don’t know whether any of these actions were taken - 22.2 / 22.4
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
I don’t know whether any of these actions were taken | 22.2 | 22.4
Table A.30: N/A; Our school or district administrators did not complete any of these ac… - 4.7 / 4.9
Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
N/A; Our school or district administrators did not complete any of these actions | 4.7 | 4.9
Table A.30: N - 475 / 452
N | 475 | 452 NOTE: Respondent
Table A.30 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.30 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions); that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “other” model, or (3) a locally developed model; and that said they were around for the initial implementation of this model saw this question.
Table A.31: 1 school year - 36.8 / 37.5
Sample (N = 439 | 420 by column) · Table A.31 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
1 school year | 36.8 | 37.5
Table A.31: 2 school years - 40.5 / 40.5
Sample (N = 439 | 420 by column) · Table A.31 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
2 school years | 40.5 | 40.5
Table A.31: 3 to 4 school years - 11.0 / 10.5
Sample (N = 439 | 420 by column) · Table A.31 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
3 to 4 school years | 11.0 | 10.5
Table A.31: 5+ school years - 1.2 / 0.9
Sample (N = 439 | 420 by column) · Table A.31 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
5+ school years | 1.2 | 0.9
Table A.31: Don’t know - 10.5 / 10.6
Sample (N = 439 | 420 by column) · Table A.31 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 10.5 | 10.6
Table A.31: N - 439 / 420
N | 439 | 420 NOTE: Only respo
Table A.31 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions); that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model; that they were around for the initial implementation of this model; and that their BTAM team is somewhat or very effective at maintaining school safety saw this question.
Table A.32: The financial costs of implementing BTAM… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 1.6 / 9.7 / 14.6 / 44.2 / 29.9
Sample (N = 450) · Principals answering the implementation experience agreement statements
The financial costs of implementing BTAM did not create any issues. | 1.6 | 9.7 | 14.6 | 44.2 | 29.9
Table A.32: It was clear BTAM was a better approach t… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.3 / 2.6 / 20.9 / 56.3 / 19.9
Sample (N = 450) · Principals answering the implementation experience agreement statements
It was clear BTAM was a better approach to managing student behavior concerns relative to our previous approaches. | 0.3 | 2.6 | 20.9 | 56.3 | 19.9
Table A.32: It was easy for us to pick the BTAM progr… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 2.7 / 7.5 / 39.5 / 37.9 / 12.4
Sample (N = 450) · Principals answering the implementation experience agreement statements
It was easy for us to pick the BTAM program we wanted to use from the options available. | 2.7 | 7.5 | 39.5 | 37.9 | 12.4
Table A.32: The BTAM program we chose was easy to ada… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.6 / 4.5 / 16.9 / 61.4 / 16.6
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
The BTAM program we chose was easy to adapt to our local needs. | 0.6 | 4.5 | 16.9 | 61.4 | 16.6
Table A.32: Our school community (e.g., parents, stud… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.2 / 1.6 / 35.1 / 45.7 / 17.5
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Our school community (e.g., parents, students) were supportive of our school’s adoption of BTAM. | 0.2 | 1.6 | 35.1 | 45.7 | 17.5
Table A.32: It was easy to coordinate with relevant o… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 1.1 / 7.2 / 16.5 / 53.7 / 21.5
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
It was easy to coordinate with relevant outside partners while implementing BTAM (e.g., police, service providers). | 1.1 | 7.2 | 16.5 | 53.7 | 21.5
Table A.32: Our school and local service providers h… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 3.1 / 17.5 / 12.8 / 49.5 / 17.1
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Our school and local service providers had enough capacity to support our BTAM efforts (e.g., counselors, mental health treatment providers). | 3.1 | 17.5 | 12.8 | 49.5 | 17.1
Table A.32: Our school staff was supportive of our sc… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.0 / 1.4 / 14.0 / 63.1 / 21.5
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Our school staff was supportive of our school’s adoption of BTAM. | 0.0 | 1.4 | 14.0 | 63.1 | 21.5
Table A.32: BTAM was well-matched to our culture and… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.0 / 2.4 / 15.3 / 62.0 / 20.4
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
BTAM was well-matched to our culture and relationships between school leaders and staff. | 0.0 | 2.4 | 15.3 | 62.0 | 20.4
Table A.32: Our existing school records and other sys… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.9 / 7.7 / 17.2 / 57.9 / 16.2
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Our existing school records and other systems were easy to use in support of BTAM. | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.2 | 57.9 | 16.2
Table A.32: We had no issues sharing information amon… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 1.1 / 9.2 / 25.6 / 52.7 / 11.4
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
We had no issues sharing information among partners for BTAM purposes (e.g., FERPA or HIPAA did not hinder information sharing). | 1.1 | 9.2 | 25.6 | 52.7 | 11.4
Table A.32: We had enough staff time to implement BT… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 3.5 / 21.0 / 20.3 / 44.3 / 10.9
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
We had enough staff time to implement BTAM. | 3.5 | 21.0 | 20.3 | 44.3 | 10.9
Table A.32: Our instructional and other school staff… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.9 / 7.9 / 21.0 / 58.7 / 11.4
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Our instructional and other school staff clearly understood the goals and reasons for implementing BTAM. | 0.9 | 7.9 | 21.0 | 58.7 | 11.4
Table A.32: Training opportunities for BTAM team mem… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 2.0 / 13.5 / 18.6 / 49.3 / 16.6
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
Training opportunities for BTAM team members were readily available. | 2.0 | 13.5 | 18.6 | 49.3 | 16.6
Table A.32: It was easy to adjust school procedures t… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 0.9 / 5.6 / 17.0 / 62.5 / 13.9
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
It was easy to adjust school procedures to integrate BTAM into the way we dealt with student behavior and discipline issues previously. | 0.9 | 5.6 | 17.0 | 62.5 | 13.9
Table A.32: We were able to use a staged process to i… - SD/D/N/A/SA: 1.7 / 10.3 / 25.8 / 53.4 / 8.8
Sample (N = 450) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team who used a named, other or locally developed model and were present at initial implementation (Table A.32)
We were able to use a staged process to implement BTAM so that it integrated smoothly into school systems broadly speaking. | 1.7 | 10.3 | 25.8 | 53.4 | 8.8
Table A.32 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions); that their team was using (1) a named model that we listed, (2) an “Other” model, or (3) a locally developed model; and that said they were around for the initial implementation of this model saw this question.
Table A.32 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a schoo
Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.
Table A.32 note: Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.32 note: FERPA = Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act; HIPAA = Health Insurance
FERPA = Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act; HIPAA = Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
A.33 No: 29.5 (all teams incl. other school-based), 24.1 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1636 | 1401 by column) · Table A.33 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
No | 29.5 | 24.1
A.33 Yes: 47.8 (all teams incl. other school-based), 52.7 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1636 | 1401 by column) · Table A.33 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Yes | 47.8 | 52.7
A.33 Don’t know: 22.7 (all teams incl. other school-based), 23.2 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1636 | 1401 by column) · Table A.33 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 22.7 | 23.2
A.33 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,636; official BTAM teams only: N=1,401
N | 1,636 | 1,401
A.33 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.34 No: 35.6 (all teams incl. other school-based), 31.0 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1400 by column) · Table A.34 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
No | 35.6 | 31.0
A.34 Yes: 44.3 (all teams incl. other school-based), 49.3 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1400 by column) · Table A.34 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Yes | 44.3 | 49.3
A.34 Don’t know: 20.1 (all teams incl. other school-based), 19.7 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1400 by column) · Table A.34 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Don’t know | 20.1 | 19.7
A.34 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,635; official BTAM teams only: N=1,400
N | 1,635 | 1,400
A.34 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.35 Students whose be…: 33.8 (all teams incl. other school-based), 27.5 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students whose behavior is regularly disruptive to instruction | 33.8 | 27.5
A.35 Students who are…: 25.2 (all teams incl. other school-based), 20.3 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who are disrespectful or argumentative with teachers or other school staff | 25.2 | 20.3
A.35 Students who may…: 81.3 (all teams incl. other school-based), 82.5 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who may be at risk of self-harm or suicide | 81.3 | 82.5
A.35 Students who are…: 70.5 (all teams incl. other school-based), 69.2 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who are regularly involved in aggressive behavior toward peers (e.g., frequent verbal or limited physical conflicts without concerns about weapon use, bullying or fighting) | 70.5 | 69.2
A.35 Students with fix…: 76.7 (all teams incl. other school-based), 80.5 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students with fixations on past school violence incidents, interest in violence or extremist movements (e.g., fixation on Columbine attacks, fixation on animal cruelty or abuse, viewing web sites with extremist or violent web content) | 76.7 | 80.5
A.35 Students who have…: 89.2 (all teams incl. other school-based), 92.6 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who have directed threats at or may be violent toward other individual students | 89.2 | 92.6
A.35 Students who have…: 88.4 (all teams incl. other school-based), 91.9 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who have made threats or may be violent toward school staff (e.g., threats against teachers) | 88.4 | 91.9
A.35 Students who have…: 82.8 (all teams incl. other school-based), 87.5 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.35 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p129, continuation page)
Students who have made threats of or may be intending to commit mass violence against the school or school community | 82.8 | 87.5
A.35 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,635; official BTAM teams only: N=1,401
N | 1,635 | 1,401
A.35 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
A.35 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.36 Once per week: 9.7 (all teams incl. other school-based), 9.0 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.36 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Once per week | 9.7 | 9.0
A.36 Once every two weeks: 9.2 (all teams incl. other school-based), 8.1 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.36 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Once every two weeks | 9.2 | 8.1
A.36 Once per month: 19.9 (all teams incl. other school-based), 19.5 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.36 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Once per month | 19.9 | 19.5
A.36 Every 2 to 3 months: 6.1 (all teams incl. other school-based), 6.2 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.36 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Every 2 to 3 months | 6.1 | 6.2
A.36 Irregularly or on…: 55.2 (all teams incl. other school-based), 57.2 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1635 | 1401 by column) · Table A.36 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Irregularly or on an as-needed basis depending on case load | 55.2 | 57.2
A.36 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,635; official BTAM teams only: N=1,401
N | 1,635 | 1,401
A.36 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.37 Interview w…: 0.6 (Never), 2.0 (Rarely), 7.8 (Sometimes), 16.1 (Frequently), 73.4 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Interview with the student | 0.6 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 16.1 | 73.4
A.37 Interview w…: 1.1 (Never), 1.6 (Rarely), 9.6 (Sometimes), 23.3 (Frequently), 64.5 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Interview with witnesses (e.g., peers, staff who witnessed behavior) | 1.1 | 1.6 | 9.6 | 23.3 | 64.5
A.37 Interview…: 1.9 (Never), 3.1 (Rarely), 16.1 (Sometimes), 25.8 (Frequently), 53.1 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Interview with potential target of a threat | 1.9 | 3.1 | 16.1 | 25.8 | 53.1
A.37 Interview…: 0.8 (Never), 2.3 (Rarely), 14.8 (Sometimes), 27.3 (Frequently), 54.7 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Interview with parents or guardians | 0.8 | 2.3 | 14.8 | 27.3 | 54.7
A.37 Interview w…: 0.4 (Never), 1.6 (Rarely), 9.1 (Sometimes), 32.5 (Frequently), 56.5 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Interview with teacher or other school staff knowledgeable about the student | 0.4 | 1.6 | 9.1 | 32.5 | 56.5
A.37 Review st…: 8.1 (Never), 18.7 (Rarely), 34.1 (Sometimes), 23.9 (Frequently), 15.3 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Review student’s publicly available social media or online footprint | 8.1 | 18.7 | 34.1 | 23.9 | 15.3
A.37 Discipline…: 0.4 (Never), 1.7 (Rarely), 10.5 (Sometimes), 27.5 (Frequently), 59.8 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Discipline records (including but not limited to history of prior threats) | 0.4 | 1.7 | 10.5 | 27.5 | 59.8
A.37 Academic r…: 1.6 (Never), 5.8 (Rarely), 21.9 (Sometimes), 27.7 (Frequently), 43.1 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Academic records | 1.6 | 5.8 | 21.9 | 27.7 | 43.1
A.37 Special ed…: 0.8 (Never), 1.8 (Rarely), 14.9 (Sometimes), 24.1 (Frequently), 58.4 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Special education records | 0.8 | 1.8 | 14.9 | 24.1 | 58.4
A.37 Records fr…: 2.2 (Never), 6.0 (Rarely), 26.2 (Sometimes), 27.1 (Frequently), 38.4 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Records from other schools a student attended previously inside your school district | 2.2 | 6.0 | 26.2 | 27.1 | 38.4
A.37 Records f…: 3.1 (Never), 10.8 (Rarely), 30.5 (Sometimes), 26.6 (Frequently), 29.1 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Records from other schools a student attended previously outside your school district | 3.1 | 10.8 | 30.5 | 26.6 | 29.1
A.37 Records f…: 5.4 (Never), 14.7 (Rarely), 37.2 (Sometimes), 22.8 (Frequently), 19.9 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Records from outside medical organizations (e.g., mental health service providers) | 5.4 | 14.7 | 37.2 | 22.8 | 19.9
A.37 Records…: 10.9 (Never), 21.0 (Rarely), 34.0 (Sometimes), 18.6 (Frequently), 15.4 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Records from outside governmental organizations (e.g., social services agencies; courts) | 10.9 | 21.0 | 34.0 | 18.6 | 15.4
A.37 Law enfo…: 19.2 (Never), 20.9 (Rarely), 28.1 (Sometimes), 15.2 (Frequently), 16.6 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Law enforcement records | 19.2 | 20.9 | 28.1 | 15.2 | 16.6
A.37 Other (ple…: 55.9 (Never), 9.9 (Rarely), 13.3 (Sometimes), 9.1 (Frequently), 11.8 (Every time)
Sample (N = 1395) · Teams answering sources-of-information question
Other (please specify) | 55.9 | 9.9 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 11.8
A.37 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.37 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district
Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.
A.37 note: Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
A.38 All BTAM activiti…: 23.5 (all teams incl. other school-based), 20.8 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1626 | 1394 by column) · Table A.38 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
All BTAM activities from meeting structure to assessment processes differ across individual cases. | 23.5 | 20.8
A.38 BTAM meetings fol…: 28.1 (all teams incl. other school-based), 28.0 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1626 | 1394 by column) · Table A.38 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
BTAM meetings follow a common structure and process, though the data sought and deliberations vary significantly from case to case. | 28.1 | 28.0
A.38 BTAM meetings fol…: 20.4 (all teams incl. other school-based), 20.3 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1626 | 1394 by column) · Table A.38 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
BTAM meetings follow a common structure and process, and we collect similar data for each case considered by the team. | 20.4 | 20.3
A.38 BTAM meetings fol…: 28.0 (all teams incl. other school-based), 31.0 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1626 | 1394 by column) · Table A.38 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
BTAM meetings follow a common structure and process, we collect similar data for each case considered by the team, and we have standardized processes that guide the application of structured tools for conducting our assessment. | 28.0 | 31.0
A.38 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,626; official BTAM teams only: N=1,394
N | 1,626 | 1,394
A.38 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.38 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
A.39 No, because our BTA…: 7.8 (all teams incl. other school-based), 7.4 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1623 | 1392 by column) · Table A.39 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
No, because our BTAM files and deliberations are closed. We cannot share any information with parents, guardians, or other third-parties. | 7.8 | 7.4
A.39 Potentially, but…: 17.5 (all teams incl. other school-based), 16.1 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1623 | 1392 by column) · Table A.39 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Potentially, but it would be difficult because of how much our process differs from case to case. | 17.5 | 16.1
A.39 Potentially, but…: 16.9 (all teams incl. other school-based), 15.9 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1623 | 1392 by column) · Table A.39 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Potentially, but could be difficult because assessments are the result of verbal deliberations among our BTAM team members. | 16.9 | 15.9
A.39 Yes, because our…: 57.8 (all teams incl. other school-based), 60.6 (official BTAM teams only)
Sample (N = 1623 | 1392 by column) · Table A.39 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Yes, because our BTAM process captures detailed information on both the rationale and data behind an assessment that would provide a basis for explanation. | 57.8 | 60.6
A.39 N: all teams incl. other school-based: N=1,623; official BTAM teams only: N=1,392
N | 1,623 | 1,392
A.39 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an a
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.39 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
A.40 Behav…: 1.7 (N/A; no option), 2.3 (never use), 7.3 (rarely use), 42.2 (sometimes use), 46.5 (of
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Behavioral corrections or discipline (for example, detention, removal of privileges) | 1.7 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 42.2 | 46.5
A.40 Suppo…: 0.7 (N/A; no option), 0.6 (never use), 4.6 (rarely use), 39.3 (sometimes use), 54.9 (of
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Supports and safety interventions for the targets or victims of threats (for example, class changes, other protective measures) | 0.7 | 0.6 | 4.6 | 39.3 | 54.9
A.40 Behav…: 2.2 (N/A; no option), 1.9 (never use), 13.9 (rarely use), 51.4 (sometimes use), 30.7 (o
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Behavioral or movement controls in school (for example, changes to arrival or passing times) | 2.2 | 1.9 | 13.9 | 51.4 | 30.7
A.40 Progr…: 0.5 (N/A; no option), 0.8 (never use), 3.9 (rarely use), 41.8 (sometimes use), 52.9 (of
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Programming to build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins, adult mentoring) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 41.8 | 52.9
A.40 Skill…: 2.5 (N/A; no option), 1.6 (never use), 12.8 (rarely use), 49.4 (sometimes use), 33.7 (o
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Skill-building services or programs (for example, social skills or life-skills programming, leadership development) | 2.5 | 1.6 | 12.8 | 49.4 | 33.7
A.40 Progr…: 3.2 (N/A; no option), 2.9 (never use), 18.1 (rarely use), 49.1 (sometimes use), 26.7 (o
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Programming to build peer relationships and engagement (for example, peer mentor groups) | 3.2 | 2.9 | 18.1 | 49.1 | 26.7
A.40 Acade…: 15.2 (N/A; no option), 6.2 (never use), 30.0 (rarely use), 39.6 (sometimes use), 8.9 (o
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Academic or vocational programming | 15.2 | 6.2 | 30.0 | 39.6 | 8.9
A.40 Speci…: 1.2 (N/A; no option), 2.9 (never use), 16.5 (rarely use), 62.9 (sometimes use), 16.6 (o
Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question
Special education or disability supports | 1.2 | 2.9 | 16.5 | 62.9 | 16.6
A.40 Mental health counseling or care: 1.9 / 1.0 / 3.5 / 46.5 / 47.1
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Mental health counseling or care | 1.9 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 46.5 | 47.1
A.40 Substance use treatment: 21.3 / 18.0 / 29.8 / 25.4 / 5.5
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Substance use treatment | 21.3 | 18.0 | 29.8 | 25.4 | 5.5
A.40 Family support and intervention programming: 8.2 / 4.2 / 21.5 / 49.5 / 16.7
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Family support and intervention programming | 8.2 | 4.2 | 21.5 | 49.5 | 16.7
A.40 Temporary removal from school (suspension): 1.8 / 3.3 / 20.2 / 55.0 / 19.6
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 1.8 | 3.3 | 20.2 | 55.0 | 19.6
A.40 Law enforcement action (for example, arrest) or criminal jus...: 3.7 / 16.6 / 36.8 / 36.0 / 6.8
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Law enforcement action (for example, arrest) or criminal justice action | 3.7 | 16.6 | 36.8 | 36.0 | 6.8
A.40 Permanent removal from school (expulsion or relocation): 9.5 / 29.7 / 38.4 / 19.2 / 3.2
Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)
Permanent removal from school (expulsion or relocation) | 9.5 | 29.7 | 38.4 | 19.2 | 3.2
Table A.40 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.40 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or...
Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.
Table A.40 note: Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
A.41 Skill-building services or programs (e.g., social skills or life-skills program...: 70.2 / 70.0
Sample (N = 1601 | 1374 by column) · Table A.41 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Skill-building services or programs (e.g., social skills or life-skills programming, leadership development) | 70.2 | 70.0
A.41 Mental health counseling or care: 74.2 / 75.1
Sample (N = 1601 | 1374 by column) · Table A.41 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Mental health counseling or care | 74.2 | 75.1
A.41 Substance use treatment: 34.9 / 36.6
Sample (N = 1601 | 1374 by column) · Table A.41 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Substance use treatment | 34.9 | 36.6
A.41 Family support and intervention programming: 57.1 / 57.9
Sample (N = 1601 | 1374 by column) · Table A.41 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Family support and intervention programming | 57.1 | 57.9
A.41 N/A; When these services are recommended by the BTAM team, the student’s family...: 13.2 / 13.1
Sample (N = 1601 | 1374 by column) · Table A.41 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
N/A; When these services are recommended by the BTAM team, the student’s family must pay the costs or be reimbursed through their own insurance coverage | 13.2 | 13.1
A.41 N: 1,601 / 1,374
N | 1,601 | 1,374
Table A.41 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.41 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.41 note: Respondents only saw a response option if they indicated previously that this re...
Respondents only saw a response option if they indicated previously that this response option was used rarely, sometimes, or often.
A.42 Our BTAM team has a standard set of actions that it takes for every student ass...: 15.7 / 15.9
Sample (N = 1609 | 1380 by column) · Table A.42 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our BTAM team has a standard set of actions that it takes for every student assessed as a potential school safety concern | 15.7 | 15.9
A.42 Our BTAM team members recommend elements to add to each intervention plan based...: 34.4 / 33.1
Sample (N = 1609 | 1380 by column) · Table A.42 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our BTAM team members recommend elements to add to each intervention plan based on their professional expertise and services from their discipline (e.g., a counselor identifies the types of counseling that should be included in the plan) | 34.4 | 33.1
A.42 Our BTAM team draws on an inventory of resources available across the school an...: 27.7 / 27.9
Sample (N = 1609 | 1380 by column) · Table A.42 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our BTAM team draws on an inventory of resources available across the school and community to collaboratively choose interventions for an intervention or safety plan | 27.7 | 27.9
A.42 Our BTAM team draws on an inventory of resources and decision support tools tha...: 22.1 / 23.1
Sample (N = 1609 | 1380 by column) · Table A.42 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Our BTAM team draws on an inventory of resources and decision support tools that help guide choices among intervention options and match interventions to individual student needs | 22.1 | 23.1
A.42 N: 1,609 / 1,380
N | 1,609 | 1,380
Table A.42 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.42 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.43 Parents/guardians of the student being assessed: 9.3 / 18.9 / 71.8
Sample (N = 1379) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Parents/guardians of the student being assessed | 9.3 | 18.9 | 71.8
A.43 Student being assessed: 16.0 / 17.7 / 66.2
Sample (N = 1379) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Student being assessed | 16.0 | 17.7 | 66.2
Table A.43 note: n = 1,379.
NOTE: n = 1,379.
Table A.43 note: Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.43 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.43 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or...
Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.
A.44 We do not monitor the progress of intervention/safety plans after they are implem...: 1.8 / 2.0
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.44 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We do not monitor the progress of intervention/safety plans after they are implemented. | 1.8 | 2.0
A.44 We rely on teachers, counselors, and others to monitor progress and make adjust...: 25.1 / 24.6
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.44 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We rely on teachers, counselors, and others to monitor progress and make adjustments to interventions without directly involving the BTAM team. | 25.1 | 24.6
A.44 We actively manage and monitor the progress of some students’ progress and make...: 22.7 / 22.7
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.44 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We actively manage and monitor the progress of some students’ progress and make adjustments as needed. | 22.7 | 22.7
A.44 We actively manage and monitor the progress of all students’ progress and make ...: 48.1 / 48.9
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.44 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We actively manage and monitor the progress of all students’ progress and make adjustments as needed. | 48.1 | 48.9
A.44 I don’t know if we monitor intervention progress.: 2.3 / 1.8
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.44 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
I don’t know if we monitor intervention progress. | 2.3 | 1.8
Table A.44 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
A.45 We receive periodic reports on progress from teachers who have direct contact w...: 66.5 / 65.0
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We receive periodic reports on progress from teachers who have direct contact with the student | 66.5 | 65.0
A.45 We receive periodic reports from staff designated to speak with the student reg...: 65.3 / 64.8
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We receive periodic reports from staff designated to speak with the student regularly as part of the plan (e.g., check in, check out programs) | 65.3 | 64.8
A.45 We receive periodic reports from other school staff (e.g., counselors): 60.6 / 58.7
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We receive periodic reports from other school staff (e.g., counselors) | 60.6 | 58.7
A.45 We receive periodic reports on treatment delivery and student progress from out...: 32.3 / 32.3
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We receive periodic reports on treatment delivery and student progress from outside providers | 32.3 | 32.3
A.45 We revisit cases during our regular BTAM team meetings when specific events occ...: 40.4 / 39.4
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We revisit cases during our regular BTAM team meetings when specific events occur (e.g., when a student returns to school after an absence) | 40.4 | 39.4
A.45 We revisit cases during our regular BTAM team meetings at regular time intervals: 38.1 / 37.7
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We revisit cases during our regular BTAM team meetings at regular time intervals | 38.1 | 37.7
A.45 We manually analyze data and track progress (e.g., use behavioral graphs to vis...: 30.4 / 30.6
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We manually analyze data and track progress (e.g., use behavioral graphs to visualize improvements in student behavior) | 30.4 | 30.6
A.45 We have a specific information/case management system that tracks data on the c...: 14.5 / 15.4
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We have a specific information/case management system that tracks data on the cases we are monitoring | 14.5 | 15.4
A.45 Other (please specify):: 1.5 / 1.5
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.45 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Other (please specify): | 1.5 | 1.5
A.45 N: 1,132 / 984
N | 1,132 | 984 |
Table A.45 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.45 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and one that monitors some or all students’ progress after a behavioral intervention or safety plan has been implemented saw this question.
A.46 No: 38.5 / 39.0
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.46 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
No | 38.5 | 39.0
A.46 Yes: 61.5 / 61.0
Sample (N = 1132 | 984 by column) · Table A.46 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Yes | 61.5 | 61.0
Table A.46 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and one that monitors some or all students’ progress after a behavioral intervention or safety plan has been implemented saw this question.
A.47 Never: 42.4 / 39.8
Sample (N = 1607 | 1378 by column) · Table A.47 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Never | 42.4 | 39.8
A.47 Rarely: 38.6 / 40.0
Sample (N = 1607 | 1378 by column) · Table A.47 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Rarely | 38.6 | 40.0
A.47 Sometimes: 14.7 / 15.6
Sample (N = 1607 | 1378 by column) · Table A.47 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Sometimes | 14.7 | 15.6
A.47 Frequently: 3.7 / 3.9
Sample (N = 1607 | 1378 by column) · Table A.47 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Frequently | 3.7 | 3.9
A.47 Every time: 0.7 / 0.8
Sample (N = 1607 | 1378 by column) · Table A.47 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
Every time | 0.7 | 0.8
A.47 N: 1,607 / 1,378
N | 1,607 | 1,378
Table A.47 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.47 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team...
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.48, Never: 31.0 / 29.7
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)
Never | 31.0 | 29.7
Table A.48, Rarely: 46.2 / 46.0
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)
Rarely | 46.2 | 46.0
Table A.48, Sometimes: 19.3 / 20.6
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)
Sometimes | 19.3 | 20.6
Table A.48, Frequently: 2.7 / 2.8
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)
Frequently | 2.7 | 2.8
Table A.48, Every time: 0.8 / 0.9
Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)
Every time | 0.8 | 0.9
Table A.48 N: 1,608; 1,379
N | 1,608 | 1,379
Table A.48 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.49, Violence rates: 10.5 / 49.1 / 38.6 / 1.4 / 0.4
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Violence rates | 10.5 | 49.1 | 38.6 | 1.4 | 0.4
Table A.49, Rates of suicidality or self-harm: 11.5 / 45.8 / 40.4 / 2.0 / 0.3
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Rates of suicidality or self-harm | 11.5 | 45.8 | 40.4 | 2.0 | 0.3
Table A.49, Suspension and expulsion rates overall: 12.5 / 41.0 / 39.8 / 6.4 / 0.3
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Suspension and expulsion rates overall | 12.5 | 41.0 | 39.8 | 6.4 | 0.3
Table A.49, Racial disparities in suspension and expulsion rates: 8.5 / 31.6 / 58.3 / 1.5 / 0.0
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Racial disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 8.5 | 31.6 | 58.3 | 1.5 | 0.0
Table A.49, Gender disparities in suspension and expulsion rates: 7.9 / 27.1 / 63.5 / 1.5 / 0.0
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Gender disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 7.9 | 27.1 | 63.5 | 1.5 | 0.0
Table A.49, Special and general education disparities in suspension …: 7.5 / 35.8 / 53.9 / 2.7 / 0.0
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Special and general education disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 7.5 | 35.8 | 53.9 | 2.7 | 0.0
Table A.49, Student feelings of safety at school: 2.6 / 7.5 / 24.2 / 58.4 / 7.3
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Student feelings of safety at school | 2.6 | 7.5 | 24.2 | 58.4 | 7.3
Table A.49, Staff (administrators, teachers, etc.) feelings of safet…: 2.8 / 7.3 / 20.2 / 62.0 / 7.8
Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Staff (administrators, teachers, etc.) feelings of safety school | 2.8 | 7.3 | 20.2 | 62.0 | 7.8
Table A.49 note: n = 1,377. Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
n = 1,377. Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.49 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.49 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or
Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.
Table A.50, Significantly worsened school climate: 0.2 / 0.1
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Significantly worsened school climate | 0.2 | 0.1
Table A.50, Worsened school climate: 0.3 / 0.3
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Worsened school climate | 0.3 | 0.3
Table A.50, Has had no impact on school climate: 23.2 / 23.9
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Has had no impact on school climate | 23.2 | 23.9
Table A.50, Improved school climate: 59.7 / 59.3
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Improved school climate | 59.7 | 59.3
Table A.50, Significantly improved school climate: 11.2 / 10.9
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Significantly improved school climate | 11.2 | 10.9
Table A.50, Don’t know: 5.4 / 5.4
Sample (N = 1604 | 1377 by column) · Table A.50 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,604); official teams only (1,377)
Don’t know | 5.4 | 5.4
Table A.50 N: 1,604; 1,377
N | 1,604 | 1,377
Table A.50 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.50 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.51, N/A; The process has been generally stable, using established approaches f…: 37.8 / 38.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
N/A; The process has been generally stable, using established approaches for assessing cases and planning interventions | 37.8 | 38.6
Table A.51, The process has changed because we needed to make adjustments to better fi…: 25.7 / 24.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process has changed because we needed to make adjustments to better fit our school’s needs | 25.7 | 24.2
Table A.51, The process has changed because we changed the staff on the team and made …: 19.5 / 18.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process has changed because we changed the staff on the team and made changes to how the team functions | 19.5 | 18.4
Table A.51, The process has changed in response to resource or other constraints that …: 12.6 / 12.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process has changed in response to resource or other constraints that limited our capacity | 12.6 | 12.1
Table A.51, The process has changed because of concerns in the community about how BTAM …: 3.0 / 3.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process has changed because of concerns in the community about how BTAM affects students | 3.0 | 3.1
Table A.51, The process has changed because we aimed to make it more effective in prot…: 29.8 / 30.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process has changed because we aimed to make it more effective in protecting our school and students | 29.8 | 30.4
Table A.51, The process changed because of changes to state law or policy about BTAM: 13.1 / 14.3
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
The process changed because of changes to state law or policy about BTAM | 13.1 | 14.3
Table A.51 N: 1,603; 1,376
N | 1,603 | 1,376
Table A.51 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.51 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.52, Not supportive: 0.4 / 0.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Not supportive | 0.4 | 0.4
Table A.52, Somewhat not supportive: 1.6 / 1.3
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Somewhat not supportive | 1.6 | 1.3
Table A.52, Neutral: 28.2 / 27.8
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Neutral | 28.2 | 27.8
Table A.52, Somewhat supportive: 28.0 / 27.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Somewhat supportive | 28.0 | 27.2
Table A.52, Supportive: 41.8 / 43.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Supportive | 41.8 | 43.4
Table A.52 N: 1,603; 1,376
N | 1,603 | 1,376
Table A.52 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.52 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.53, No, our BTAM program is implemented without dedicated staff or additional …: 58.2 / 56.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
No, our BTAM program is implemented without dedicated staff or additional funds for programs beyond what our school already had available. | 58.2 | 56.6
Table A.53, No, we fund our activities in other ways (please describe):: 2.0 / 1.9
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
No, we fund our activities in other ways (please describe): | 2.0 | 1.9
Table A.53, Yes, our program has dedicated funding in the school or district budget: 21.8 / 22.8
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Yes, our program has dedicated funding in the school or district budget | 21.8 | 22.8
Table A.53, Don’t know: 17.9 / 18.7
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Don’t know | 17.9 | 18.7
Table A.53 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.53 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.54, N/A; Our team members do not receive BTAM-specific training: 16.1 / 12.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
N/A; Our team members do not receive BTAM-specific training | 16.1 | 12.6
Table A.54, Once at the beginning of their tenure on the team: 14.8 / 16.3
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Once at the beginning of their tenure on the team | 14.8 | 16.3
Table A.54, Once per school year: 34.2 / 35.7
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Once per school year | 34.2 | 35.7
Table A.54, At least twice per school year: 11.6 / 12.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
At least twice per school year | 11.6 | 12.2
Table A.54, On an as-needed basis: 23.3 / 23.3
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.52-A.54 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
On an as-needed basis | 23.3 | 23.3
Table A.54 N: 1,603; 1,376
N | 1,603 | 1,376
Table A.54 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.54 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.55, No, very unlikely: 25.9 / 28.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
No, very unlikely | 25.9 | 28.2
Table A.55, No, unlikely: 32.5 / 34.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
No, unlikely | 32.5 | 34.4
Table A.55, Unsure; maybe or maybe not: 28.9 / 26.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Unsure; maybe or maybe not | 28.9 | 26.1
Table A.55, Yes, likely: 9.0 / 8.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Yes, likely | 9.0 | 8.1
Table A.55, Yes, very likely: 3.7 / 3.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Yes, very likely | 3.7 | 3.1
Table A.55 N: 1,603; 1,376
N | 1,603 | 1,376
Table A.55 note: Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Columns may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.55 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Table A.56, N/A; we have not experienced any challenges when it comes to BTAM operatio…: 43.6 / 44.1
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
N/A; we have not experienced any challenges when it comes to BTAM operations | 43.6 | 44.1
Table A.56, Concerns about BTAM effectiveness in reducing school violence: 9.2 / 9.0
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Concerns about BTAM effectiveness in reducing school violence | 9.2 | 9.0
Table A.56, Difficulty funding continued BTAM operation: 7.0 / 6.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Difficulty funding continued BTAM operation | 7.0 | 6.6
Table A.56, Staff or district leaders concerned that BTAM is too complex: 9.2 / 9.5
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Staff or district leaders concerned that BTAM is too complex | 9.2 | 9.5
Table A.56, Difficulties adapting BTAM to local needs: 4.7 / 4.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Difficulties adapting BTAM to local needs | 4.7 | 4.6
Table A.56, Reduction in community support for the BTAM program: 2.2 / 2.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Reduction in community support for the BTAM program | 2.2 | 2.2
Table A.56, Reduction in school staff support for the BTAM program: 6.9 / 6.6
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Reduction in school staff support for the BTAM program | 6.9 | 6.6
Table A.56, Problems maintaining connections to outside service providers for interven…: 16.6 / 16.2
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Problems maintaining connections to outside service providers for intervention | 16.6 | 16.2
Table A.56, Service provider capacity limits for how many students each can serve: 21.2 / 21.0
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Service provider capacity limits for how many students each can serve | 21.2 | 21.0
Table A.56, Parents unable to support individual intervention efforts (e.g., due to co…: 14.7 / 14.9
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Parents unable to support individual intervention efforts (e.g., due to costs) | 14.7 | 14.9
Table A.56, Parents unwilling to implement or participate in recommended interventions: 30.2 / 29.8
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Parents unwilling to implement or participate in recommended interventions | 30.2 | 29.8
Table A.56, Staffing constraints make BTAM difficult to maintain: 17.9 / 16.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Staffing constraints make BTAM difficult to maintain | 17.9 | 16.4
Table A.56, Can’t get needed training for BTAM team members: 8.3 / 7.3
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Can’t get needed training for BTAM team members | 8.3 | 7.3
Table A.56, Problems getting data from outside organizations (e.g., law enforcement, med…: 8.4 / 8.4
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Problems getting data from outside organizations (e.g., law enforcement, medical providers) | 8.4 | 8.4
Table A.56, Other (please specify):: 2.9 / 2.9
Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Tables A.55-A.56 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)
Other (please specify): | 2.9 | 2.9
Table A.56 N: 1,603; 1,376
N | 1,603 | 1,376
Table A.56 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.56 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
We conduct after-action reviews of individual cases: 46.4 / 48.1 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We conduct after-action reviews of individual cases | 46.4 | 48.1
We validate that specific intervention options are bein…: 36.4 / 36.2 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We validate that specific intervention options are being delivered as designed, by appropriately trained staff, and for the recommended amount of time. | 36.4 | 36.2
We collect and analyze data about how specific interven…: 39.7 / 39.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect and analyze data about how specific intervention options are influencing student-level outcomes | 39.7 | 39.9
We periodically assess and revise the menu of intervent…: 29.2 / 29.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We periodically assess and revise the menu of interventions available to the BTAM team | 29.2 | 29.9
We collect and analyze data on student outcomes across…: 27.3 / 28.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect and analyze data on student outcomes across all students served by the program to monitor the overall effectiveness of our BTAM efforts | 27.3 | 28.0
We collect and analyze data on student outcomes for dif…: 16.3 / 16.7 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect and analyze data on student outcomes for different student populations (e.g., special education students, neurodiverse students, racial/ethnic minority students, gender and sexual minority students, socioeconomically disadvantaged students) to assess the fairness of our BTAM efforts | 16.3 | 16.7
We collect feedback from students and/or parents/guardi…: 18.5 / 18.7 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect feedback from students and/or parents/guardians of students once their BTAM intervention is complete | 18.5 | 18.7
We collect feedback from students, parents/guardians, a…: 18.6 / 19.2 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect feedback from students, parents/guardians, and/or staff who were the targets or victims of threatening behavior | 18.6 | 19.2
We collect feedback from school staff who have been dir…: 32.2 / 31.8 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We collect feedback from school staff who have been directly involved in implementing BTAM interventions | 32.2 | 31.8
We carry out training and outreach for the school staff…: 21.9 / 22.8 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
We carry out training and outreach for the school staff and students to maintain knowledge of BTAM and how to refer individuals of concern | 21.9 | 22.8
None of these processes are part of how our BTAM progra…: 14.5 / 13.5 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 1602 | 1376 by column) · Table A.57 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only
None of these processes are part of how our BTAM program operates | 14.5 | 13.5
N: 1,602 (all teams), 1,376 (official BTAM teams only)
N | 1,602 | 1,376
Table A.57 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
NOTE: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.57 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM tea…
Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
The outside BTAM team we work with only becomes involved in a case when we seek…: 54.8 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
The outside BTAM team we work with only becomes involved in a case when we seek out their assistance | 54.8
We work with our outside BTAM team when we seek out their help AND when they ap…: 32.9 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We work with our outside BTAM team when we seek out their help AND when they approach us with information referred to them | 32.9
The only times we work with our outside BTAM team is when they approach us abou…: 8.2 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
The only times we work with our outside BTAM team is when they approach us about a threat or tip reported to them | 8.2
Don’t know: 4.1 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Don’t know | 4.1
Table A.58 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the…
Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the school or district and that they were somewhat or extremely familiar with the operation and processes of this outside team saw this question.
Very rarely: 23.6 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Very rarely | 23.6
Rarely: 23.2 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Rarely | 23.2
Sometimes: 31.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Sometimes | 31.9
Frequently: 17.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Frequently | 17.9
Very frequently: 3.4 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Very frequently | 3.4
Table A.59 note: n = 122.
NOTE: n = 122.
Table A.59 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the…
Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the school or district and that they were somewhat or extremely familiar with the operation and processes of this outside team saw this question.
Outside BTAM teams have access to more or different information than our school…: 38.4 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Outside BTAM teams have access to more or different information than our school or district does, including ready access to law enforcement data and other sources | 38.4
Outside teams have access to a broader variety of service providers or provider…: 54.2 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Outside teams have access to a broader variety of service providers or providers with greater capacity to deliver intervention programming than we do at the school- or district-level | 54.2
Outside teams don’t know as much about school environments and/or youth populat…: 25.2 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Outside teams don’t know as much about school environments and/or youth populations, which can be problematic when it comes to assessing the level of threat posed by student behavior | 25.2
Outside teams don’t know as much about the community context of my school, whic…: 19.9 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Outside teams don’t know as much about the community context of my school, which can be problematic in responding to student behavior in a practical way | 19.9
Table A.60 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.60 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the…
Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the school or district and that they were somewhat or extremely familiar with the operation and processes of this outside team saw this question.
We had a BTAM team previously, but it was discontinued.: 0.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We had a BTAM team previously, but it was discontinued. | 0.0
We have considered starting a BTAM team but have not done so: 12.4 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We have considered starting a BTAM team but have not done so | 12.4
We have not considered starting a BTAM team: 66.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
We have not considered starting a BTAM team | 66.0
Don’t know: 21.5 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Don’t know | 21.5
Table A.61 note: Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)
Column does not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.
Table A.61 note: Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-leve…
Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
None of these reasons were important: X (weighted pct)
None of these reasons were important | X
Concerns about BTAM effectiveness in reducing school violence: X (weighted pct)
Concerns about BTAM effectiveness in reducing school violence | X
Table A.62: Funding constraints: X (weighted pct)
Funding constraints | X
Staff or district leader concerns about BTAM being too complex: X (weighted pct)
Staff or district leader concerns about BTAM being too complex | X
Difficulties adapting BTAM to our local needs: X (weighted pct)
Difficulties adapting BTAM to our local needs | X
Our local community did not support our use of BTAM: X (weighted pct)
Our local community did not support our use of BTAM | X
Problems maintaining connections to outside service providers for intervention: X (weighted pct)
Problems maintaining connections to outside service providers for intervention | X
Service provider capacity limits for how many students they could serve: X (weighted pct)
Service provider capacity limits for how many students they could serve | X
Parents unable to support individual intervention efforts (e.g., due to costs): X (weighted pct)
Parents unable to support individual intervention efforts (e.g., due to costs) | X
Parents unwilling to implement or participate in recommended interventions: X (weighted pct)
Parents unwilling to implement or participate in recommended interventions | X
Staffing constraints making BTAM difficult to maintain: X (weighted pct)
Staffing constraints making BTAM difficult to maintain | X
Reduction in school staff support for the program: X (weighted pct)
Reduction in school staff support for the program | X
Couldn’t get needed training for BTAM team members: X (weighted pct)
Couldn’t get needed training for BTAM team members | X
Problems getting data from outside organizations (e.g., law enforcement, medica…: X (weighted pct)
Problems getting data from outside organizations (e.g., law enforcement, medical providers) | X
Table A.62: Other (please specify):: X (weighted pct)
Other (please specify): | X
I don’t know why we discontinued the program: X (weighted pct)
I don’t know why we discontinued the program | X
Table A.62 note: n = 0.
NOTE: n = 0.
Table A.62 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.62 note: Only respondents who said their school did have a school- or district-level BTA…
Only respondents who said their school did have a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and that this was discontinued would have seen this question, but none did.
Table A.62 note: X = Response suppressed because of the small sample size.
X = Response suppressed because of the small sample size.
I don’t know why we haven’t implemented a BTAM program: X (weighted pct)
I don’t know why we haven’t implemented a BTAM program | X
Our school safety concerns don’t justify implementing BTAM: X (weighted pct)
Our school safety concerns don’t justify implementing BTAM | X
Table A.63: Funding constraints: X (weighted pct)
Funding constraints | X
Staffing constraints: X (weighted pct)
Staffing constraints | X
BTAM is not mandated in our state: X (weighted pct)
BTAM is not mandated in our state | X
BTAM would not be accepted by our local community: X (weighted pct)
BTAM would not be accepted by our local community | X
BTAM would not work well in our school culture: X (weighted pct)
BTAM would not work well in our school culture | X
Our school staff would not support BTAM: X (weighted pct)
Our school staff would not support BTAM | X
Table A.63: Other (please specify):: X (weighted pct)
Other (please specify): | X
Table A.63 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.63 note: Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-leve…
Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) but that their school has considered starting one but has not yet done so saw this question.
Table A.63 note: X = Response suppressed because of the small sample size.
X = Response suppressed because of the small sample size.
I don’t know why we haven’t pursued implementing a BTAM program: 57.8 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
I don’t know why we haven’t pursued implementing a BTAM program | 57.8
Our school safety concerns don’t justify implementing BTAM: 5.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Our school safety concerns don’t justify implementing BTAM | 5.9
Funding constraints: 20.8 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Funding constraints | 20.8
Staffing constraints: 30.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Staffing constraints | 30.9
BTAM is not mandated in our state: 16.9 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
BTAM is not mandated in our state | 16.9
BTAM would not be accepted by our local community: 1.8 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
BTAM would not be accepted by our local community | 1.8
BTAM would not work well in our school culture: 0.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
BTAM would not work well in our school culture | 0.0
Our school staff would not support BTAM: 0.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Our school staff would not support BTAM | 0.0
Other (please specify): 5.0 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 32) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)
Other (please specify) | 5.0
Table A.64 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.64 note: Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-leve…
Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) and has not considered starting one saw this question.
If we had a violent incident in our school or district and BTAM implementation…: 52.1 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If we had a violent incident in our school or district and BTAM implementation became part of our response | 52.1
If state or local law changed and required us to implement: 60.1 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If state or local law changed and required us to implement | 60.1
If school district policy changed and required our school to implement: 58.5 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If school district policy changed and required our school to implement | 58.5
If concerns about liability for school violence were to increase: 36.3 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If concerns about liability for school violence were to increase | 36.3
If our community wanted us to adopt a BTAM program: 40.3 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If our community wanted us to adopt a BTAM program | 40.3
If other organizations we depend on (e.g., our local law enforcement department…: 34.1 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
If other organizations we depend on (e.g., our local law enforcement department) encouraged us to adopt a BTAM program | 34.1
Other (please specify): 3.7 (weighted pct)
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
Other (please specify) | 3.7
I do not think any factors would prompt my school or district to implement a BT…: 12.9 (weighted pc…
Sample (N = 47) · Principals at schools with no school- or district-level BTAM team (or equivalent), Table A.65, n = 47
I do not think any factors would prompt my school or district to implement a BTAM team | 12.9
Table A.65 note: Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.
Table A.65 note: Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-leve…
Only respondents who said their school does not have a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.
Top
Find the Perfect Training Class For You