NCIER®

Report page 77

Report page 77 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Fact [V] p077-10

About a quarter of principals named counselors as first decisionmaker in elementary Scenarios D, E

Sample (N = 148 total; column N not printed) · Scenario D respondents (observations)

For certain scenarios (such as Scenario D [explicit threat, history of academic issues, withdrawal or depression] and Scenario E [violence fixation, history of academic issues, withdrawal or depression, concerning home context] at the elementary school level), about a quarter of principals identified school counselors as the first decisionmaker.

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p077-11

Secondary principals most often named an administrator, then a teacher (Scenarios I and K)

Secondary school principals most commonly identified a school administrator as the initial decisionmaker; the second most commonly selected option was a teacher (e.g., in Scenario I [history of misbehavior and academic issues] and Scenario K [physical altercation]).

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p077-12

Only secondary scenario with counselor as initial decisionmaker was Scenario N (22 percent)

Sample (n = 126 of 126) · Scenario N respondents (observations)

The only secondary school scenario where principals selected the school counselor as the initial decisionmaker (22 percent of respondents) was Scenario N (violence fixation, withdrawal or depression).

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p077-13

Scenario D vignette: 'I am going to kill you for that' shouted, academic problems, student cried

Scenario D: A student has an intense verbal confrontation with another student at school, shouting, “I am going to kill you for that.” The student has no history of fighting or disruptive behavior but has had academic problems. A teacher who spoke with the student does not believe the threat was serious but does note that the student started crying during their conversation and would not share why they were so upset.

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p077-15

Scenario I vignette: repeatedly disruptive in biology class, struggling with material

Scenario I: A student is repeatedly disruptive in their biology class, talking with other students or playing on their phone. Though in a course normally taken by students one grade below theirs, the student still appears to be struggling with the material. The teacher has made attempts to correct or redirect the behavior but has been unsuccessful and reached a point where frustration is affecting the entire class.

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p077-16

Scenario K vignette: P.E. pushing between two students, one still angry and agitated

Scenario K: During P.E., two students begin pushing each other during a soccer activity. When the P.E. teacher approaches and tells them to stop, both back off and apologize to varying degrees. The teacher notices and is concerned that one of the students still appears angry and agitated after the fight.

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p077-17

Respondents saw some initial-decisionmaker options only if their school had such personnel

With the exceptions of teacher; school administrator; non-school-based law enforcement; and MTSS, PBIS, or other behavioral support team, respondents only saw each potential initial decisionmaker if they responded previously that they had such personnel at their school.

p. 77 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You