NCIER®

Report page 66

Report page 66 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Evidence [V] p066-02

BTAM is framed as an alternative to exclusionary discipline, which risks long-term harms

BTAM in K–12 schools is framed as an alternative to exclusionary school discipline, which has been recognized as risking long-term harms to students and causing other damage to a school’s community (Huang and Cornell, 2021; Cornell et al., 2018; Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports, 2023).

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-05

Thirty percent of principals said their BTAM teams never use exclusionary discipline

Sample (N = 1379) · Teams answering exclusionary discipline and arrest/prosecution questions (Figure 9.2)

Thirty percent of principals reported their BTAM teams never use exclusionary discipline (i.e., they never expel students, place them in different schools, or suspend them for a month or more).

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-06

Exclusionary discipline use: rarely 46 percent, sometimes 21 percent, frequently 3 percent, always 1

Sample (N = 1379) · Teams answering exclusionary discipline and arrest/prosecution questions (Figure 9.2)

Meanwhile, 46 percent of principals said their BTAM teams rarely use exclusionary discipline; 21 percent reported doing so sometimes; 3 percent reported frequently turning to exclusionary discipline; and 1 percent said they always employ such measures.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-08

Forty percent never refer students to law enforcement for arrest or prosecution; another 40 percent

Sample (N = 1379) · Teams answering exclusionary discipline and arrest/prosecution questions (Figure 9.2)

Forty percent of principals said their BTAM teams never refer students to law enforcement for arrest or prosecution, and another 40 percent said they rarely make such referrals.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-09

Law enforcement referral: sometimes sixteen percent, frequently 4 percent, always 1 percent

Sample (N = 1379) · Teams answering exclusionary discipline and arrest/prosecution questions (Figure 9.2)

Sixteen percent said they sometimes did so, and 4 percent and 1 percent said they either frequently or always referred cases to law enforcement for arrest or prosecution, respectively.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p066-10

Authors lack data on caseload size or case nature behind frequent exclusionary or arrest use

Although it is concerning that a handful of schools reported engaging in such practices frequently or every time a case is referred to the BTAM team, we do not have information about the size of teams’ caseloads or about the nature of specific cases.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-12

Elementary schools were particularly likely to say they never use exclusionary discipline

Our data also show that elementary schools—whose BTAM teams likely deal with relatively less serious student behavior compared with secondary schools—were particularly likely to say they never use exclusionary discipline for students referred to a BTAM team.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p066-14

Some elementary schools said their teams have expelled or referred students to law enforcement with

However, although these practices are less common in elementary schools compared with middle and high schools, some elementary schools said that their BTAM teams have expelled or referred students to law enforcement with some regularity.

p. 66 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You