NCIER®

Report page 63

Report page 63 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Statement [V] p063-01

BTAM intent: interventions that benefit the student and ensure school community safety

The intent of BTAM is to use information about the student and their behavior to determine the right types of interventions that will simultaneously benefit the student (address the concerning behavior to decrease the risk of harm) and also ensure the safety of the school community.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-03

Standard-set option least commonly selected: only 16 percent of principals

Sample (N = 1380) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

This was least commonly selected by principals, with only 16 percent indicating that their BTAM responded the same way in every case referred.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-05

Most common approach, chosen by one-third: members bring options from their disciplines

Sample (N = 1380) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

The most common approach or option, selected by one-third of respondents, was that BTAM teams rely on their members to “bring intervention options from their individual professional disciplines to the table” during intervention planning.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Conjecture [V] p063-07

Relying on members might produce inconsistent decisions if key members are absent or turnover is fre

Notably, such practice also relies heavily on having the right people “at the table” for every case; if key BTAM team members are regularly absent from meetings or team meetings are unplanned or a team is affected by frequent staff turnover, a school’s BTAM program might reach inconsistent decisions about which interventions to use from case to case.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Definition [V] p063-08

Other two approaches build systems and decision aids as a support system for the team

The other two approaches/options include building systems and decision aids that help teams design intervention plans, essentially providing a “support system for the team” to build a strong and consistent process for selecting interventions across different students assessed by the team while still developing plans that are consistent for students’ needs.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-09

Both include an intervention inventory so teams need not rely on individual members' memory and atte

Both include building an inventory of interventions that are available to the school, so the team is not reliant on the memory and attendance of individual team members to be aware of what intervention options are available to meet a student’s needs.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-11

Twenty-eight percent of respondents used an inventory without additional decision support tools

Sample (N = 1380) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Twenty-eight percent of respondents indicated that their teams used such an inventory but did not have additional decision support tools to help them do so.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-13

Just under a quarter (23 percent) had both an intervention inventory and decision support tool

Sample (N = 1380) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Just under a quarter of respondents (23 percent) indicated that their BTAM team had both an intervention inventory and decision support tool that helped them as they designed intervention plans.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-15

More than half of schools (51 percent) support intervention planning with an inventory

Sample (N = 1380) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Because both of these response options included having an intervention inventory available, taken together they indicate that more than half of schools (51 percent) support intervention planning with an inventory of available intervention options.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-16

91 percent of BTAM teams involve parents or guardians; 84 percent involve the referred student

Sample (N = 1379) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

According to principals’ reports, 91 percent of school BTAM teams typically involve parents or guardians of the referred student in the intervention and safety planning process; 84 percent also noted involving the referred student in the process.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-17

Parents and students were generally consulted rather than directly participating in decisions

Principals indicated that parents and students were generally consulted to provide information that informs the team’s decisions, as opposed to directly participating in planning decisions.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p063-18

72 percent of schools consulted with parents or guardians; only 19 percent allowed direct participat

Sample (N = 1379) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

For example, 72 percent of schools consulted with parents or guardians, but only 19 percent allowed parents to directly participate in planning decisions.

p. 63 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You