NCIER®

Report page 20

Report page 20 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Definition [V] p020-01

NTAC defines a behavioral threat assessment as a proactive approach (NTAC, 2022)

“A behavioral threat assessment is a proactive approach to identify, assess, and provide appropriate interventions and resources for students who display a behavior that elicits concern for the safety of themselves or others”

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-02

Introduction: school violence and threats remain a significant concern in K–12 education

Incidents of school violence and threats—whether directed at students, staff, or the broader school community—remain a significant concern in K–12 education.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-03

School leaders must determine an appropriate response to student behavior raising alarms

When a student’s behavior raises alarms about potential harm to themselves or others, school leaders face the complex task of determining an appropriate response.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Evidence [V] p020-04

Research: exclusionary discipline can have lasting negative effects and may not reduce risk

Although it may seem that removing the student from school is the safest option, research has shown that exclusionary discipline, such as a suspension or an expulsion, can have lasting negative effects on students and may not effectively reduce risk.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-05

Most threats are found not to be credible; removal can sometimes increase risk of harm

Most threats are ultimately found not to be credible, and removing students from the school environment can sometimes increase the risk of harm by severing connections to support and oversight.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-06

Schools increasingly seek alternatives that balance safety with students' well-being and rights

As a result, schools increasingly seek alternatives that balance safety with the well-being and rights of all students.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-07

Federal data: as many as 85 percent of schools had a BTAM team in place as of 2024

Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)

BTAM has emerged as a widely adopted approach to address these challenges in K–12 schools across the United States, with federal data showing that as many as 85 percent of schools nationwide had a BTAM team in place as of 2024

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Definition [V] p020-08

BTAM approach: a multidisciplinary team systematically evaluates and responds to concerning behavior

The BTAM approach involves a multidisciplinary team—often including school administrators, counselors, and public safety professionals—systematically evaluating and responding to concerning student behaviors or threats.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-09

BTAM teams are at the core of school- or district-level BTAM programs

These teams are at the core of school- or district-level BTAM programs, which schools and districts often implement as part of their broader school safety efforts.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Definition [V] p020-10

BTAM process typically has three stages: referral, assessment, management

The BTAM process typically includes three stages: referral of a student based on observed behaviors or reported concerns, assessment of whether a student poses a risk of harm, and management of the situation through tailored interventions.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p020-11

BTAM aims to identify concerning behavior early so schools respond proportionately

The BTAM approach aims to identify concerning behavior early, enabling schools to respond proportionately and provide support where needed.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p020-12

BTAM helps prevent violence and reduces reliance on exclusionary discipline

This approach not only helps prevent violence but also reduces reliance on exclusionary discipline, promoting a safer school environment.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Fact [V] p020-13

Many schools and districts developed their own BTAM models besides private, federal, and state model

Although several entities, such as private organizations, federal government agencies, and U.S. states, have developed BTAM models and frameworks for use by K–12 schools, many schools and districts across the country have also developed their own models and approaches, as this report discusses.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p020-14

Footnote 1: the report focuses on BTAM implementation at school and district level

In this report, we focus on BTAM implementation at the level of K–12 schools and school districts.

p. 20 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You