Report page 136

Table A.48, Never: 31.0 / 29.7

Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)

Never | 31.0 | 29.7

• BTAM Team
• Exclusionary Discipline

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48, Rarely: 46.2 / 46.0

Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)

Rarely | 46.2 | 46.0

• BTAM Team
• Exclusionary Discipline

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48, Sometimes: 19.3 / 20.6

Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)

Sometimes | 19.3 | 20.6

• BTAM Team
• Exclusionary Discipline

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48, Frequently: 2.7 / 2.8

Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)

Frequently | 2.7 | 2.8

• BTAM Team
• Exclusionary Discipline

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48, Every time: 0.8 / 0.9

Sample (N = 1608 | 1379 by column) · Table A.48 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,608); official teams only (1,379)

Every time | 0.8 | 0.9

• BTAM Team
• Exclusionary Discipline

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48 N: 1,608; 1,379

N | 1,608 | 1,379

• Exclusionary Discipline
• Methodology

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.48 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team

Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.

• Exclusionary Discipline
• Methodology

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Violence rates: 10.5 / 49.1 / 38.6 / 1.4 / 0.4

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Violence rates | 10.5 | 49.1 | 38.6 | 1.4 | 0.4

• Effect Violence Suicide
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Rates of suicidality or self-harm: 11.5 / 45.8 / 40.4 / 2.0 / 0.3

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Rates of suicidality or self-harm | 11.5 | 45.8 | 40.4 | 2.0 | 0.3

• Effect Violence Suicide
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Suspension and expulsion rates overall: 12.5 / 41.0 / 39.8 / 6.4 / 0.3

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Suspension and expulsion rates overall | 12.5 | 41.0 | 39.8 | 6.4 | 0.3

• Effect Exclusionary Discipline
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Racial disparities in suspension and expulsion rates: 8.5 / 31.6 / 58.3 / 1.5 / 0.0

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Racial disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 8.5 | 31.6 | 58.3 | 1.5 | 0.0

• Effect Exclusionary Discipline
• Equity Disparities

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Gender disparities in suspension and expulsion rates: 7.9 / 27.1 / 63.5 / 1.5 / 0.0

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Gender disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 7.9 | 27.1 | 63.5 | 1.5 | 0.0

• Effect Exclusionary Discipline
• Equity Disparities

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Special and general education disparities in suspension …: 7.5 / 35.8 / 53.9 / 2.7 / 0.0

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Special and general education disparities in suspension and expulsion rates | 7.5 | 35.8 | 53.9 | 2.7 | 0.0

• Effect Exclusionary Discipline
• Equity Disparities

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Student feelings of safety at school: 2.6 / 7.5 / 24.2 / 58.4 / 7.3

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Student feelings of safety at school | 2.6 | 7.5 | 24.2 | 58.4 | 7.3

• Effect Student Staff Safety Feelings
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49, Staff (administrators, teachers, etc.) feelings of safet…: 2.8 / 7.3 / 20.2 / 62.0 / 7.8

Sample (N = 1377) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Staff (administrators, teachers, etc.) feelings of safety school | 2.8 | 7.3 | 20.2 | 62.0 | 7.8

• Effect Student Staff Safety Feelings
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49 note: n = 1,377. Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.

Sample (no n: a percentage change, not a share of a sample) · a percentage that is not a share of a sample (e.g. a percentage-point change or a weighted estimate of the population)

n = 1,377. Rows may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.

• Methodology
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49 note: Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team

Only respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team (or an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions) saw this question.

• Methodology
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies

Table A.49 note: Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or

Table only includes data from respondents who said their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team, not respondents who said they have an alternative team that performs BTAM-like functions.

• Methodology
• Perceived Effects

cite page 136 Appendix A: Survey Frequencies