NCIER®

Program Changes

35 claims on pp. 34–137 (fact 33, statement 1, conjecture 1).

Claims about Program Changes

Statement [V] p034-04

Later discussion covers changes since implementation, current challenges, continuous improvement

The discussion then shifts to the changes that schools have made to their BTAM efforts since implementation, challenges they told us they are facing, and the processes they have built into their programs to support continuous improvement efforts.

p. 34 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 34 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 34 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p102-20

The other 60 percent of schools made one or more changes to BTAM since initial implementation

Sample (N = 1376) · Teams answering community support / challenges / processes / training questions

However, the other 60 percent reported that they have made one or more changes to the program since its initial implementation.

p. 102 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 102 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 102 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p102-21

Principals changed BTAM to be more effective (30 percent) or to better fit school needs (24 percent)

Sample (n = undeterminable of 1376) · Teams answering community support / challenges / processes / training questions

Most commonly, principals indicated that their BTAM process changed as they aimed to make it more effective at protecting the school and students (30 percent) or adjustments were needed for BTAM to better fit their school’s needs (24 percent).

p. 102 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 102 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 102 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p102-22

Few schools changed BTAM due to resource constraints (12 percent) or community concerns about studen

Sample (n = undeterminable of 1376) · Teams answering community support / challenges / processes / training questions

Few schools reported making changes in response to specific problems, such as resource or other constraints that limited the capacity of BTAM (12 percent) or concerns in the community about how BTAM would affect students (3 percent).

p. 102 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 102 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 102 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p102-23

Patterns suggest changes aimed to improve BTAM in context, not respond to threats to its functioning

These patterns suggest that schools made changes to BTAM processes to help improve how BTAM worked in their specific school or community context, rather than in response to challenges that might otherwise jeopardize the effective functioning of a school BTAM program.

p. 102 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 102 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 102 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p102-24

14 percent of schools changed their BTAM process in response to changes to state law or policy

Sample (N = 1376) · Official BTAM teams only answering Table A.51

That said, 14 percent of schools did change their BTAM process in response to changes to state law or policy regarding BTAM.

p. 102 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 102 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 102 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-09

Table A.26 Implemented as originally designed: 47.4 (official + other teams); 47.3 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have implemented the program as it was originally designed and specified by the developers | 47.4 | 47.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-10

Table A.26 Changed form, kept core functions: 33.0 (official + other teams); 32.7 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have made changes to the program’s form (e.g., related to materials, staffing, specification of protocols, etc.), while maintaining its core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 33.0 | 32.7

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-11

Table A.26 Changed core functions: 1.3 (official + other teams); 1.3 (official only)

Sample (N = 468 | 445 by column) · Table A.26 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

We have made changes that directly modified the program’s core functions related to assessing and managing threats | 1.3 | 1.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-16

Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (resource/staff constraints): 39.5 (official + other tea...

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to resource or staff constraints | 39.5 | 40.4

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-17

Table A.27 Reduced recommended personnel (community concerns/context): 6.5 (official + other team...

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We reduced the number of recommended personnel serving on the team due to community concerns or context | 6.5 | 5.3

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p123-18

Table A.27 Added personnel beyond recommended: 29.2 (official + other teams); 29.6 (official only)

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We added personnel to our team beyond the recommended personnel | 29.2 | 29.6

p. 123 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 123 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 123 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-01

Table A.27: We changed the program’s recommended procedures for collecting informatio… - 10.7 / 10.7

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We changed the program’s recommended procedures for collecting information to assess threats | 10.7 | 10.7

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-02

Table A.27: We adjusted the types of data used to assess threats because we were unab… - 16.5 / 16.0

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We adjusted the types of data used to assess threats because we were unable to access or use some types of data recommended by the program | 16.5 | 16.0

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-03

Table A.27: We use additional data to assess threats and concerning student behavior… - 25.1 / 25.8

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We use additional data to assess threats and concerning student behavior beyond what the program recommends, in addition to using the data recommended by the program | 25.1 | 25.8

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-04

Table A.27: We modified (or don’t use) worksheets, checklists or other tools that com… - 34.4 / 35.1

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We modified (or don’t use) worksheets, checklists or other tools that come with the program | 34.4 | 35.1

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-05

Table A.27: We created worksheets, checklists or other tools that didn’t originally c… - 25.2 / 23.3

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We created worksheets, checklists or other tools that didn’t originally come with the program | 25.2 | 23.3

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-06

Table A.27: We changed the way the program recommends assessing whether a student poses… - 3.1 / 3.3

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We changed the way the program recommends assessing whether a student poses a threat to themselves or others | 3.1 | 3.3

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-07

Table A.27: We don’t use some of the intervention options recommended by the program… - 17.4 / 17.4

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We don’t use some of the intervention options recommended by the program because of access issues or resource constraints | 17.4 | 17.4

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p124-08

Table A.27: We added intervention options beyond those recommended by the program to… - 21.1 / 20.8

Sample (N = 162 | 153 by column) · Table A.27 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only (N row printed on p124, continuation page)

We added intervention options beyond those recommended by the program to meet our local needs | 21.1 | 20.8

p. 124 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 124 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 124 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-10

Table A.51, N/A; The process has been generally stable, using established approaches f…: 37.8 / 38.6

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

N/A; The process has been generally stable, using established approaches for assessing cases and planning interventions | 37.8 | 38.6

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-11

Table A.51, The process has changed because we needed to make adjustments to better fi…: 25.7 / 24.2

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

The process has changed because we needed to make adjustments to better fit our school’s needs | 25.7 | 24.2

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-12

Table A.51, The process has changed because we changed the staff on the team and made …: 19.5 / 18.4

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

The process has changed because we changed the staff on the team and made changes to how the team functions | 19.5 | 18.4

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-13

Table A.51, The process has changed in response to resource or other constraints that …: 12.6 / 12.1

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

The process has changed in response to resource or other constraints that limited our capacity | 12.6 | 12.1

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-14

Table A.51, The process has changed because of concerns in the community about how BTAM …: 3.0 / 3.1

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

The process has changed because of concerns in the community about how BTAM affects students | 3.0 | 3.1

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p137-15

Table A.51, The process has changed because we aimed to make it more effective in prot…: 29.8 / 30.4

Sample (N = 1603 | 1376 by column) · Table A.51 columns: official+other school-based teams (1,603); official teams only (1,376)

The process has changed because we aimed to make it more effective in protecting our school and students | 29.8 | 30.4

p. 137 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 137 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 137 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You