NCIER®

Pre Implementation Planning

37 claims on pp. 35–126 (fact 28, statement 4, conjecture 5).

Claims about Pre Implementation Planning

Fact [V] p035-04

Table 3.1: Staged process integrated smoothly into school systems: 12 / 26 / 62

Sample (N = 450) · Principals answering the implementation experience agreement statements

We were able to use a staged process to implement BTAM so that it integrated smoothly into school systems broadly speaking. | 12 | 26 | 62

p. 35 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 35 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 35 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p055-13

Schools or districts likely made a decision about whether and which BTAM model to adopt

Before formally adopting a BTAM model, it is likely that schools (or districts) engaged in a decisionmaking process about whether to do so and, having decided to move forward, about which specific model to adopt.

p. 55 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 55 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 55 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p055-14

Principals were given a list of planning actions drawn from the literature on implementation

Drawing on the published literature describing how schools plan and prepare for the implementation of new programs, and the types of activities that are recommended as part of implementation efforts, we provided principals with a list of actions their school or district administrators may have taken as part of this process

p. 55 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 55 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 55 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p056-02

Small districts (fewer than 10,000 students) approached adoption somewhat differently

With the caveat that principals in large districts were more likely to report not knowing about the specific actions their school or district took in the lead up to BTAM implementation, principals’ reports suggest that small districts (those serving fewer than 10,000 students) approached adoption somewhat differently from large districts (see Figure 7.2).

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-03

Small-district principals more likely to consult local law enforcement (48 versus 33 percent)

Sample (n = undeterminable of 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

For example, principals of schools in small districts were more likely to report consulting with local law enforcement agencies (48 versus 33 percent, respectively).

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-07

Small districts more outward-facing; large districts more inward-facing in planning

More small districts also engaged in outward-facing activities (e.g., discussing participation with community providers, consulting with law enforcement), whereas more large districts engaged in inward-facing activities (e.g., surveying their [larger population] of school staff

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-09

Surveyed or met with students, parents, community: small district 14, large district 24 (%)

Sample (N = 451 total; column N not printed) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Surveyed or met with students, parents, and/or the larger school community* | 14 | 24

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-10

Estimated funding and resources: small district 14, large district 24 (%)

Sample (N = 451 total; column N not printed) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Estimated funding and other resource levels necessary to implement the program and ensured they were available* | 14 | 24

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-13

Discussed participation with community and service providers: small district 38, large 28 (%)

Sample (N = 451 total; column N not printed) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Identified and discussed participation in BTAM with relevant community and service provider organizations (e.g., mental health providers, social service agencies, non-governmental service providers) | 38 | 28

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p056-14

Figure 7.2 note: actions-before-implementation question (n = 451), select all that apply

This figure depicts response data from the following survey question: “Which of the following actions do you know your school took before implementing its BTAM program?” (n = 451). Respondents were instructed to select all that apply.

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-15

Figure 7.2: 22 percent did not know of actions; 5 percent said none were completed

Sample (N = 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Respondents were also given the following reply options: “I don't know whether any of these actions were taken” (selected by 22 percent of respondents); and “Our school or district administrators did not complete any of these actions” (selected by 5 percent of respondents).

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-16

Figure 7.2 includes only respondents with a team and model present at initial implementation

This figure includes only those who said that their school has a school- or district-level BTAM team; that their team was using a named model that we listed, an “other” model, or a locally created one; and that they were around for the initial implementation of this model.

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p056-17

Figure 7.2 asterisk marks significant small versus large district difference

An asterisk (*) indicates that the percentage of principals in small districts who said their school or district administrators took a specific action before implementing its BTAM program was statistically significantly different from the percentage of principals in large districts who said similarly.

p. 56 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 56 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 56 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p057-01

Smaller districts may seek buy-in outside their school community; larger ones use internal resources

This could also suggest that smaller districts are having to look outside their immediate school community for buy-in and support, relative to larger districts that are able to draw and depend more on internal resources.

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p057-02

Most schools did not carry out many recommended planning activities; none done by over half

Sample (N = 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Although only 5 percent of respondents overall said that their school or district administrators engaged in none of the activities we listed, no one option was implemented by more than half of represented schools.

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p057-03

Most common planning activity was consulting local law enforcement (just over 42 percent)

Sample (N = 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

The most common planning activity across schools was to consult with local law enforcement (just over 42 percent of schools did that).

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p057-04

Surveying students or parents and estimating funding needs least common (more than 17 percent)

Sample (N = 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Across the other options, surveying or meeting with students or parents and estimating funding needs were the least common (more than 17 percent reported doing each of those).

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p057-05

About 30 percent of schools implemented each of the other three planning activities

Sample (N = 451) · Principals answering the pre-implementation actions question

Only about 30 percent of schools implemented one of each of the other three types of planning activities (surveying or meeting with staff, inventorying intervention programs, and discussing participation with community organizations and service providers).

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p057-06

Many schools did some planning but few pursued a comprehensive set; potential readiness gaps

These data suggest that while many schools did engage in some pre-implementation planning, few pursued a comprehensive set of activities, indicating potential gaps in readiness or variability across districts.

p. 57 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 57 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 57 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p125-15

Table A.30: Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with students, pare… - 17.5 / 17.1

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

Our school or district administrators surveyed or met with students, parents, and/or the larger school community | 17.5 | 17.1

p. 125 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 125 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 125 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p125-16

Table A.30: Our school or district administrators estimated funding and other resourc… - 18.5 / 17.5

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

Our school or district administrators estimated funding and other resource levels necessary to implement the program and ensured they were available | 18.5 | 17.5

p. 125 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 125 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 125 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p125-17

Table A.30: Our school or district administrators consulted with our local law enforc… - 41.0 / 42.5

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

Our school or district administrators consulted with our local law enforcement organization | 41.0 | 42.5

p. 125 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 125 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 125 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p125-18

Table A.30: Our school or district administrators inventoried what intervention progr… - 30.9 / 31.3

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

Our school or district administrators inventoried what intervention programs we had available | 30.9 | 31.3

p. 125 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 125 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 125 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p125-19

Table A.30: Our school or district administrators identified and discussed participat… - 33.8 / 34.3

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

Our school or district administrators identified and discussed participation in BTAM with relevant community and service provider organizations (e.g., mental health providers, social service agencies, non-governmental service providers) | 33.8 | 34.3

p. 125 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 125 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 125 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p126-01

Table A.30: N/A; Our school or district administrators did not complete any of these ac… - 4.7 / 4.9

Sample (N = 475 | 452 by column) · Table A.30 columns: Official BTAM teams and other school-based teams | Official BTAM teams only

N/A; Our school or district administrators did not complete any of these actions | 4.7 | 4.9

p. 126 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 126 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 126 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You