NCIER®

Intervention Menu

145 claims on pp. 7–132 (fact 102, statement 5, evidence 2, conclusion 1, conjecture 2, definition 33).

Claims about Intervention Menu

Evidence [V] p062-02

BTAM models emphasize individualized responses and recommend varied intervention options

BTAM models emphasize individualized responses and recommend a variety of intervention options, such as academic or social/emotional supportive services, monitoring, counseling, and safety planning tailored to the assessed needs of the individual and the situation at hand (see, e.g., Jackson et al., 2025).

p. 62 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 62 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 62 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p062-11

The chapter covers how schools select interventions and the options offered in school or by referral

In this chapter, we discuss how schools with official BTAM programs are approaching the behavioral threat management and support component of BTAM, reviewing responses about the decisionmaking process for selecting interventions and supports and the types of interventions schools are offering, both at the school and through referral to outside services.

p. 62 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 62 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 62 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p064-02

Substance use treatment is the only option not universally available: 79 percent of schools have it

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

The only intervention not universally available across responding schools—but still widely available—is substance use treatment; 79 percent of schools have this intervention as an available option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p064-03

More secondary than elementary schools have substance use treatment, likely because illicit use rise

Unsurprisingly, more secondary schools have access to substance use treatment options than elementary schools, likely because the percentage of youth reporting they use any illicit substance increases with age (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2023).

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p064-04

Virtually all schools use trusted-adult programming: 53 percent often, 42 percent sometimes, 4 perce

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

For example, virtually all schools use programming to build trusted relationships with adults, but the frequency they use these interventions varies: 53 percent report using this often; 42 percent report sometimes; and 4 percent report rarely using it as an option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p064-05

91 percent have the option to permanently remove students, yet 30 percent of schools never use it

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

As an example, while 91 percent of principals indicate that their BTAM team has the option to permanently remove students from school via expulsion or relocation, 30 percent of schools report never using this option.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p064-07

Only 17 percent often use special education supports and 5 percent often refer to substance use trea

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

By contrast, only 17 percent report that they often use special education supports, and 5 percent report that they often refer students to substance use treatment.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conjecture [V] p064-08

Differences in frequency are likely related to the types of cases referred to BTAM teams

These differences in frequency with which schools use specific interventions are likely related to the types of cases referred to BTAM teams—that is, incidents that involve substance use may be rarer as part of the case types referred to BTAM teams, therefore leading schools to only rarely include such treatment as part of an intervention plan.

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p064-14

Intervention options vary: skill-building, trusted adults, special education, counseling, removal

As shown in Figure 9.1, these options vary and can include skill-building services, programs geared toward building relationships with trusted adults, special education supports, mental health counseling, or temporary removal from school (e.g., suspension).

p. 64 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 64 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 64 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p065-01

Supports and safety interventions for the targets or victims of threats: never 1, rarely 5, sometime

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

Supports and safety interventions for the targets or victims of threats | 1 | 5 | 39 | 55 | 1 | 99 | 99

p. 65 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 65 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 65 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p065-15

Figure 9.1 note: survey question on use of options in intervention plans (n = 1,384)

NOTE: This figure depicts response data from the following survey question: “When your BTAM team intervenes with a student who is assessed as being at some risk of causing harm to themselves or others, how commonly are the following options part of the resulting intervention or safety plan?” (n = 1,384).

p. 65 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 65 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 65 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p068-03

Only 37 percent of schools provided free substance use treatment to students referred to BTAM

Sample (N = 1374) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Meanwhile, only 37 percent of schools provided free substance use treatment to students referred to BTAM; note that schools reported using this intervention option infrequently (as shown in Figure 9.1).

p. 68 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 68 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 68 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p087-26

Schools typically use multiple interventions, raising the question of which compose the response

Because schools typically use multiple interventions to respond to an incident, this raises questions about what specific interventions tend to compose the list of actions that schools take in response to an incident.

p. 87 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 87 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 87 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [I] p088-33

Figure 11.6 shows the mean number of interventions schools reported taking per scenario

interventions that schools reported taking in response to each scenario presented.

p. 88 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 88 part and the sentence begins on page 87. Full sentence (pages 87–88): “Figure 11.6 shows the mean number of interventions that schools reported taking in response to each scenario presented.”

Report page 88 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 88 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p117-19

Table A.16 Elementary, Warning or…: A 86.4, B 48.0, C 33.2, D 54.0, E 37.8, F 40.2, G 55.0, H 23.1

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Warning or verbal correction of behavior | 86.4 | 48.0 | 33.2 | 54.0 | 37.8 | 40.2 | 55.0 | 23.1

p. 117 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 117 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 117 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p117-20

Table A.16 Elementary, Disciplinary…: A 67.7, B 78.4, C 73.5, D 59.7, E 23.9, F 78.5, G 71.3, H 69.8

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Disciplinary measures (for example, in-school detention; removal of privileges) | 67.7 | 78.4 | 73.5 | 59.7 | 23.9 | 78.5 | 71.3 | 69.8

p. 117 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 117 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 117 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p117-21

Table A.16 Elementary, Parent co…: A 86.0, B 83.7, C 87.8, D 88.8, E 90.4, F 92.8, G 90.9, H 85.3

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Parent consultation or home visit | 86.0 | 83.7 | 87.8 | 88.8 | 90.4 | 92.8 | 90.9 | 85.3

p. 117 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 117 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 117 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p117-22

Table A.16 Elementary, Warning to n…: A 5.9, B 20.4, C 19.1, D 44.0, E 24.8, F 36.8, G 46.1, H 61.7

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Warning to named targets or victims of threats and safety planning to protect targets/victims | 5.9 | 20.4 | 19.1 | 44.0 | 24.8 | 36.8 | 46.1 | 61.7

p. 117 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 117 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 117 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p117-23

Table A.16 Elementary, Behaviora…: A 17.1, B 29.3, C 18.6, D 18.8, E 21.8, F 31.8, G 47.4, H 45.2

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Behavioral or movement controls (for example, changes to arrival time or passing times) | 17.1 | 29.3 | 18.6 | 18.8 | 21.8 | 31.8 | 47.4 | 45.2

p. 117 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 117 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 117 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-01

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 43.0, B 50.0, C 27.6, D 59.1, E 64.6, F 63.1, G 63.3, H 51.8

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins; adult mentoring) | 43.0 | 50.0 | 27.6 | 59.1 | 64.6 | 63.1 | 63.3 | 51.8

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-02

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 42.4, B 51.7, C 23.6, D 46.2, E 47.6, F 57.4, G 53.4, H 40.6

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start skill-building services (e.g., social skills- or leadership skills-building program) | 42.4 | 51.7 | 23.6 | 46.2 | 47.6 | 57.4 | 53.4 | 40.6

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-03

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 27.6, B 42.0, C 20.3, D 49.2, E 42.6, F 31.6, G 44.9, H 40.0

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build peer relationships and engagement (for example, friend or peer mentor groups) | 27.6 | 42.0 | 20.3 | 49.2 | 42.6 | 31.6 | 44.9 | 40.0

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-04

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need fo…: A 11.3, B 9.4, C 2.1, D 15.4, E 7.9, F 14.9, G 4.5, H 8.8

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start individualized academic or vocational programming | 11.3 | 9.4 | 2.1 | 15.4 | 7.9 | 14.9 | 4.5 | 8.8

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-05

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need…: A 22.6, B 30.7, C 3.5, D 13.0, E 7.7, F 22.8, G 14.8, H 13.5

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start special education or disability supports | 22.6 | 30.7 | 3.5 | 13.0 | 7.7 | 22.8 | 14.8 | 13.5

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-06

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 33.3, B 45.7, C 43.4, D 62.7, E 77.1, F 65.1, G 71.7, H 70.1

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start mental health counseling or care | 33.3 | 45.7 | 43.4 | 62.7 | 77.1 | 65.1 | 71.7 | 70.1

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-07

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess need for…: A 2.2, B 2.8, C 71.3, D 4.7, E 4.0, F 4.8, G 0.8, H 4.2

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start substance use treatment | 2.2 | 2.8 | 71.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 4.2

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-08

Table A.16 Elementary, Assess nee…: A 14.3, B 26.9, C 39.6, D 27.5, E 52.0, F 40.7, G 46.3, H 45.8

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start family support and intervention programming for the student and their family | 14.3 | 26.9 | 39.6 | 27.5 | 52.0 | 40.7 | 46.3 | 45.8

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-09

Table A.16 Elementary, Temporary…: A 11.3, B 29.7, C 31.7, D 20.8, E 15.6, F 44.9, G 29.5, H 70.4

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 11.3 | 29.7 | 31.7 | 20.8 | 15.6 | 44.9 | 29.5 | 70.4

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-10

Table A.16 Elementary, Law enforcemen…: A 3.0, B 3.1, C 15.2, D 3.5, E 9.1, F 22.4, G 17.5, H 41.1

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Law enforcement action (for example, arrest), civil or criminal legal proceedings | 3.0 | 3.1 | 15.2 | 3.5 | 9.1 | 22.4 | 17.5 | 41.1

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-11

Table A.16 Elementary, Permanent removal…: A 1.6, B 2.2, C 1.0, D 2.5, E 0.0, F 6.8, G 5.0, H 15.0

Sample (N = 351 | 335 | 131 | 148 | 136 | 137 | 133 | 686 by column) · Table A.16 scenario columns A-H (elementary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Permanent removal from school (expulsion, transfer to an alternative school) | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 15.0

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-16

Table A.17 Secondary, Warning or…: I 72.5, J 25.5, K 85.5, L 34.9, M 41.7, N 32.5, O 15.4, P 18.8

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Warning or verbal correction of behavior | 72.5 | 25.5 | 85.5 | 34.9 | 41.7 | 32.5 | 15.4 | 18.8

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-17

Table A.17 Secondary, Disciplinary…: I 59.8, J 79.1, K 52.9, L 74.6, M 87.3, N 32.3, O 36.0, P 67.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Disciplinary measures (for example, in-school detention; removal of privileges) | 59.8 | 79.1 | 52.9 | 74.6 | 87.3 | 32.3 | 36.0 | 67.7

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-18

Table A.17 Secondary, Parent consul…: I 83.4, J 92.1, K 67.1, L 80.7, M 87.1, N 89.4, O 88.1, P 87.5

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Parent consultation or home visit | 83.4 | 92.1 | 67.1 | 80.7 | 87.1 | 89.4 | 88.1 | 87.5

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-19

Table A.17 Secondary, Warning to named…: I 7.3, J 9.8, K 18.1, L 9.5, M 13.1, N 24.1, O 46.8, P 57.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Warning to named targets or victims of threats and safety planning to protect targets/victims | 7.3 | 9.8 | 18.1 | 9.5 | 13.1 | 24.1 | 46.8 | 57.7

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p118-20

Table A.17 Secondary, Behavioral or…: I 11.2, J 34.2, K 18.1, L 11.6, M 26.8, N 28.6, O 34.9, P 56.3

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Behavioral or movement controls (for example, changes to arrival time or passing times) | 11.2 | 34.2 | 18.1 | 11.6 | 26.8 | 28.6 | 34.9 | 56.3

p. 118 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 118 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 118 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-01

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 30.3, J 47.3, K 24.4, L 16.5, M 48.4, N 61.1, O 58.3, P 44.0

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins; adult mentoring) | 30.3 | 47.3 | 24.4 | 16.5 | 48.4 | 61.1 | 58.3 | 44.0

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-02

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 25.8, J 25.8, K 18.7, L 12.2, M 36.1, N 44.2, O 33.4, P 31.0

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start skill-building services (e.g., social skills- or leadership skills-building program) | 25.8 | 25.8 | 18.7 | 12.2 | 36.1 | 44.2 | 33.4 | 31.0

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-03

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 16.4, J 21.3, K 23.1, L 12.4, M 20.4, N 46.4, O 31.5, P 32.4

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start programming to help the student build peer relationships and engagement (for example, friend or peer mentor groups) | 16.4 | 21.3 | 23.1 | 12.4 | 20.4 | 46.4 | 31.5 | 32.4

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-04

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for or…: I 37.2, J 9.9, K 2.2, L 1.8, M 8.3, N 11.5, O 12.0, P 8.2

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start individualized academic or vocational programming | 37.2 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 8.2

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-05

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 33.7, J 8.0, K 2.3, L 3.7, M 29.2, N 13.9, O 14.2, P 12.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start special education or disability supports | 33.7 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 29.2 | 13.9 | 14.2 | 12.7

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-06

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess nee…: I 21.4, J 68.1, K 18.2, L 20.8, M 56.1, N 81.9, O 70.6, P 61.8

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start mental health counseling or care | 21.4 | 68.1 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 56.1 | 81.9 | 70.6 | 61.8

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-07

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need for…: I 4.1, J 68.1, K 2.0, L 4.6, M 6.5, N 13.4, O 16.0, P 8.8

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start substance use treatment | 4.1 | 68.1 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 13.4 | 16.0 | 8.8

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-08

Table A.17 Secondary, Assess need fo…: I 12.3, J 40.9, K 4.5, L 12.3, M 27.3, N 49.6, O 46.0, P 37.6

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Assess need for or start family support and intervention programming for the student and their family | 12.3 | 40.9 | 4.5 | 12.3 | 27.3 | 49.6 | 46.0 | 37.6

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-09

Table A.17 Secondary, Temporary rem…: I 7.9, J 60.3, K 9.2, L 56.1, M 48.0, N 26.6, O 51.7, P 72.9

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Temporary removal from school (suspension) | 7.9 | 60.3 | 9.2 | 56.1 | 48.0 | 26.6 | 51.7 | 72.9

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-10

Table A.17 Secondary, Law enforcemen…: I 4.7, J 32.4, K 3.8, L 26.4, M 12.8, N 25.4, O 51.7, P 52.7

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Law enforcement action (for example, arrest), civil or criminal legal proceedings | 4.7 | 32.4 | 3.8 | 26.4 | 12.8 | 25.4 | 51.7 | 52.7

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p119-11

Table A.17 Secondary, Permanent rem…: I 3.0, J 12.2, K 3.3, L 11.1, M 8.2, N 12.0, O 23.9, P 18.6

Sample (N = 734 | 139 | 128 | 103 | 134 | 126 | 105 | 733 by column) · Table A.17 scenario columns I-P (secondary), schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team

Permanent removal from school (expulsion, transfer to an alternative school) | 3.0 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 11.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 23.9 | 18.6

p. 119 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 119 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 119 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p131-09

A.40 Suppo…: 0.7 (N/A; no option), 0.6 (never use), 4.6 (rarely use), 39.3 (sometimes use), 54.9 (of

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

Supports and safety interventions for the targets or victims of threats (for example, class changes, other protective measures) | 0.7 | 0.6 | 4.6 | 39.3 | 54.9

p. 131 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 131 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 131 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p131-10

A.40 Behav…: 2.2 (N/A; no option), 1.9 (never use), 13.9 (rarely use), 51.4 (sometimes use), 30.7 (o

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

Behavioral or movement controls in school (for example, changes to arrival or passing times) | 2.2 | 1.9 | 13.9 | 51.4 | 30.7

p. 131 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 131 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 131 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p131-11

A.40 Progr…: 0.5 (N/A; no option), 0.8 (never use), 3.9 (rarely use), 41.8 (sometimes use), 52.9 (of

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

Programming to build relationships with trusted adults (for example, regular check-ins, adult mentoring) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 41.8 | 52.9

p. 131 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 131 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 131 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p131-12

A.40 Skill…: 2.5 (N/A; no option), 1.6 (never use), 12.8 (rarely use), 49.4 (sometimes use), 33.7 (o

Sample (N = 1384) · Teams answering intervention/safety plan components question

Skill-building services or programs (for example, social skills or life-skills programming, leadership development) | 2.5 | 1.6 | 12.8 | 49.4 | 33.7

p. 131 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 131 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 131 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p132-05

A.40 Law enforcement action (for example, arrest) or criminal jus...: 3.7 / 16.6 / 36.8 / 36.0 / 6.8

Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)

Law enforcement action (for example, arrest) or criminal justice action | 3.7 | 16.6 | 36.8 | 36.0 | 6.8

p. 132 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 132 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 132 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p132-06

A.40 Permanent removal from school (expulsion or relocation): 9.5 / 29.7 / 38.4 / 19.2 / 3.2

Sample (N = 1384) · Principals at schools with a school- or district-level BTAM team answering Table A.40 (intervention/safety plan components)

Permanent removal from school (expulsion or relocation) | 9.5 | 29.7 | 38.4 | 19.2 | 3.2

p. 132 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 132 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 132 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You