NCIER®

External Teams

65 claims on pp. 26–147 (fact 60, statement 3, evidence 1, conjecture 1).

Claims about External Teams

Fact [I] p026-14

Nine percent of schools reported working with an external BTAM team

Sample (N = 1746) · All principals who completed the survey and received a weight (weighted to national K-12 public school principals/schools)

Nine percent of schools reported working with an

p. 26 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 26 part and the sentence continues on page 27. Full sentence (pages 26–27): “Nine percent of schools reported working with an external BTAM team, as represented by the superimposed orange box in Figure 2.1.”

Report page 26 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 26 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p027-10

Figure 2.1 note: survey item on whether an outside BTAM team serves the school

“Some schools are served by BTAM teams external to a school or district. These teams may be managed by a community organization; a local, county, state, or federal government entity; a law enforcement agency; or other organizations. Is your school served by an outside BTAM team?”

p. 27 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 27 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 27 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-01

9 percent of schools (roughly 8,000) work with an external BTAM team

Sample (N = 1746) · All principals who completed the survey and received a weight (weighted to national K-12 public school principals/schools)

As shown in Figure 2.1, 9 percent of schools (or roughly 8,000 schools across the United States) work with an external BTAM team.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-02

Of schools with external teams, 89 percent said they were community- or county-level teams

Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Of those schools supported by external teams, the vast majority (89 percent) said these were community- or county-level teams that respond to cases in local schools and in the broader community.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-03

Only 5 percent received support from a state-level team; only 2 percent engaged a federal-agency tea

Sample (N = 174) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Only 5 percent of schools received support from a state-level team, and only 2 percent engaged with a team managed by a federal agency (such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI]) about specific cases.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-04

55 percent of schools with external teams said the team is involved only when the school seeks assis

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Most schools that worked with such teams (55 percent) said an outside BTAM team only becomes involved in a case when the school specifically seeks out its assistance.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-05

8 percent said they engage an outside team only when the team approaches the school about a threat o

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Conversely, a handful (8 percent) reported that the only time their school engages with an outside BTAM team is when the external team approaches the school about a specific threat or tip received that is relevant to the school.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-08

Thirty-eight percent said outside teams have access to more or different information than the school

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Thirty-eight percent said outside BTAM teams have access to more or different information than the school or district does, including ready access to law enforcement data and other sources—a potential benefit.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-09

Slightly more than half of schools engaged with external teams gained access to more service provide

Another potential benefit of external teams, which slightly more than half of schools that had engaged with these teams experienced, is access to a broader variety of service providers or providers with greater capacity to deliver intervention programming relative to what the school is able to provide.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-10

25 percent said external teams know less about school environments and youth than school-based stake

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

One-quarter (25 percent) of these respondents said that external teams do not know as much about school environments and/or youth populations relative to school-based stakeholders, which can be problematic when it comes to assessing the level of threat posed by student behavior.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-11

20 percent of principals said outside teams do not know as much about the specific school community

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Similarly, 20 percent of principals noted that outside teams do not know as much about the specific school community context.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-13

High school principals: 48 percent said external teams do not know much about school environments or

Sample (column N undeterminable) · High school principals served by an external BTAM team

They were more likely than their elementary and middle school counterparts to believe that external teams do not know much about school environments and/or youth populations (48 percent said this) and also less likely than middle school principals to believe that these teams have access to a broader variety of service providers.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p030-07

Fig 2.2: Supported by BTAM team external to school district: Other states 11 percent, encouraged in

Sample (N = 423 | 481 | 842 by column) · State-policy groups in column order: other states, encouraged BTAM use only, early legislation states

Supported by BTAM team external to school district | 11 | 9 | 8

p. 30 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 30 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 30 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p030-10

Figure 2.2 note: survey item on whether an outside BTAM team serves the school

“Some schools are served by BTAM teams external to a school or district. These teams may be managed by a community organization; a local, county, state, or federal government entity; a law enforcement agency; or other organizations. Is your school served by an outside BTAM team?”

p. 30 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 30 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 30 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-02

We work with our outside BTAM team when we seek out their help AND when they ap…: 32.9 (weighted pc…

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

We work with our outside BTAM team when we seek out their help AND when they approach us with information referred to them | 32.9

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-13

Table A.59 note: Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the…

Only respondents who said their school is served by a BTAM team external to the school or district and that they were somewhat or extremely familiar with the operation and processes of this outside team saw this question.

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-14

Outside BTAM teams have access to more or different information than our school…: 38.4 (weighted pc…

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Outside BTAM teams have access to more or different information than our school or district does, including ready access to law enforcement data and other sources | 38.4

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-15

Outside teams have access to a broader variety of service providers or provider…: 54.2 (weighted pc…

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Outside teams have access to a broader variety of service providers or providers with greater capacity to deliver intervention programming than we do at the school- or district-level | 54.2

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-16

Outside teams don’t know as much about school environments and/or youth populat…: 25.2 (weighted pc…

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Outside teams don’t know as much about school environments and/or youth populations, which can be problematic when it comes to assessing the level of threat posed by student behavior | 25.2

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p141-17

Outside teams don’t know as much about the community context of my school, whic…: 19.9 (weighted pc…

Sample (N = 122) · Appendix A table base (respondents answering the table question; see note for tables)

Outside teams don’t know as much about the community context of my school, which can be problematic in responding to student behavior in a practical way | 19.9

p. 141 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 141 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 141 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p146-15

Schools without BTAM teams (or only an external team) got a shorter survey, at most 15 minutes

Respondents in schools that did not have BTAM teams (or had only an external team) progressed through a shorter survey, designed to take at the most 15 minutes to complete. These participants received more scenarios about discipline incidents at their schools.

p. 146 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 146 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 146 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You