NCIER®

Report page 44

Report page 44 with the extracted claims highlighted
Click the page to enlarge. Highlighted passages match the claims listed alongside.

Claims on this page

Conclusion [V] p044-02

Only cases revealing potential unmet disability-related needs should be referred for evaluation

While a referral for special education evaluation should be considered in each case, only cases that uncover potential unmet needs related to qualifying disability categories should be referred for special education evaluation.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-04

Schools must log special ed records access; only parents' consent or educational need allows it

First, schools must document access to special education records, including in progress or previous referrals for evaluation, to ensure that those records are not accessed without parental permission except by those with a legitimate educational right to know the contents of the records.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Statement [V] p044-05

BTAM team members, even non-district ones, generally fall under the exception and may access records

Members of the BTAM team, including any formal and regular team members not employed by the district, are generally considered part of this exception meaning they may be able to access the student’s records.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-07

Full IEP team must set scope of any BTAM-recommended evaluations, following timelines

Second, if the BTAM team recommends additional evaluations, then the entire IEP team must be involved in determining the scope of those evaluations, and all notification and evaluation procedures and timelines must be followed.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-08

BTAM teams must engage student, family, IEP team and those who know the student best

Further, to ensure that the concerning behaviors are understood in the context of the student’s disability, BTAM teams must be intentional about engaging in dialogue with the student, family members, and members of the IEP team, as well as those who know the student best during the interview and information-gathering process.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-09

Information gathering must review IEP service delivery, present levels and goal progress

Additionally, the information-gathering process must include a review of existing IEP services and the extent to which those were delivered as intended as well as a review of the student’s present levels of performance and progress toward goals and objectives. These procedures ensure that the impact of the student’s disability is clearly understood in relation to the concerning behavior.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-12

BTAM team must go beyond risk identification and work with IEP team to boost supports

The BTAM team must do more than identify if there is a substantive risk to self or others; the team must work collaboratively with the IEP team to deeply understand the situation in enough detail to increase services and supports effectively.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map
Conclusion [V] p044-13

Include experts in interpreting special education evaluations to inform BTAM determinations

Ensuring that the BTAM team includes individuals with expertise in interpreting relevant special education evaluations, specifically those working closely with the student, should inform BTAM team determinations.

p. 44 · NCIER Claim Map

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You