NCIER®

Secret Service behavioral threat assessment model

28 claims on pp. 3–73 (fact 12, statement 7, evidence 4, conclusion 2, definition 3).

Claims about Secret Service behavioral threat assessment model

Definition [V] p003-07

Secret Service model identifies concerning individuals, assesses risk, then manages it

The Secret Service model is designed to identify individuals displaying threatening or concerning behavior, gather information to assess if that individual poses a risk of violence, and then manage the risk by implementing the appropriate interventions.

p. 3 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 3 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 3 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p009-02

Identifying and intervening with risky individuals became known as Protective Intelligence

In the decades that followed, the agency’s capacity to identify and intervene with those who pose a risk of harm to a protected person became a central feature of its protective mission and came to be known within the Secret Service as Protective Intelligence.

p. 9 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 9 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 9 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p009-03

Secret Service commissioned its earliest behavioral science research in the 1960s

Just as the Secret Service’s mission to prevent assassination using Protective Intelligence is longstanding, so is the agency’s interest in behavioral assessment as a field of scientific study, with the agency’s earliest behavioral science research commissioned in the 1960s.

p. 9 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 9 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 9 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p009-04

A 1981 conference recommended an internal Secret Service behavioral research capacity

To further understand the relationship between behavioral assessment and violence prevention, the Secret Service convened a conference in 1981 involving agency representatives and leading behavioral scientists from across the country. One of the resulting recommendations was that the Secret Service establish an internal behavioral science research capacity to continue advancing the agency’s ability to prevent violence.

p. 9 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 9 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 9 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [I] p009-08

Secret Service model identifies, assesses and manages risk to preempt attacks on protectees

The Secret Service model involves identifying individuals who display an unusual or inappropriate interest in a protected person, gathering information to assess whether an individual poses a risk of violence to

p. 9 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 9 part and the sentence continues on page 10 (claim p010-01). Full sentence (pages 9–10): “The Secret Service model involves identifying individuals who display an unusual or inappropriate interest in a protected person, gathering information to assess whether an individual poses a risk of violence to the protectee, and managing the risk to preempt the possibility of an attack.”

Report page 9 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 9 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Definition [I] p010-01

Secret Service model includes managing risk to preempt an attack on the protectee

the protectee, and managing the risk to preempt the possibility of an attack.

p. 10 · NCIER Claim Map

Why inferred The sentence crosses a page break: this quote is the page 10 part and the sentence begins on page 9 (claim p009-08). Full sentence (pages 9–10): “The Secret Service model involves identifying individuals who display an unusual or inappropriate interest in a protected person, gathering information to assess whether an individual poses a risk of violence to the protectee, and managing the risk to preempt the possibility of an attack.”

Report page 10 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 10 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conclusion [V] p010-03

Protectee model can help other agencies prevent attacks on schools, workplaces and gatherings

The same behavioral threat assessment model that is used to keep Secret Service protectees safe can be utilized by other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to prevent other forms of targeted violence, including attacks targeting schools, workplaces, houses of worship, and public gatherings.

p. 10 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 10 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 10 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p011-02

Steps describe how agencies can adopt Secret Service model principles to intervene

The steps that follow describe how agencies can adopt the principles of the Secret Service model to proactively identify and intervene with those who intend to carry out acts of targeted violence in their communities.

p. 11 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 11 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 11 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p015-02

Process rests on NTAC finding that most attackers elicit concern from others beforehand

The process was built upon NTAC’s research which found that most individuals who engage in acts of targeted violence elicit concern in those around them prior to the attack.

p. 15 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 15 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 15 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p015-03

Secret Service model identifies concerning individuals, assesses risk, and manages it

The Secret Service model, therefore, is designed to identify individuals displaying threatening or concerning behavior, gather information to assess if an individual poses a risk of violence, and then manage the risk by implementing appropriate interventions.

p. 15 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 15 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 15 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p015-04

Model adapted to all forms of targeted violence, with four example forms like terrorism

The Secret Service model has since been adapted to prevent all forms of targeted violence impacting communities in America, including acts of workplace violence, K–12 school shootings, terrorism, and mass attacks in public spaces.

p. 15 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 15 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 15 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p024-05

Secret Service policy makes risk evaluation primary and criminal investigation secondary

As an example, Secret Service policy states that the primary objective of Secret Service Protective Intelligence investigations is to gather and evaluate information about potential risks to the people, places, and events the agency protects. Secret Service policy clearly establishes that investigating violations of federal criminal statute as part of a Protective Intelligence investigation is a secondary objective.

p. 24 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 24 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 24 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p024-08

Secret Service opens investigations on concerning interest in protectees, not only direct threats

For example, while making a direct threat against the president would initiate a behavioral threat assessment, it is not the Secret Service’s sole threshold. The Secret Service initiates a Protective Intelligence investigation when an individual displays a threatening or concerning direction of interest toward any person or place protected by the agency.

p. 24 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 24 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 24 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-01

All Secret Service cases are centrally run by the Protective Intelligence and Assessment Division

A distinguishing feature of the Secret Service’s behavioral threat assessment approach is that all cases are centrally administered by the Secret Service Protective Intelligence and Assessment Division (PID).

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-03

Headquarters agents and analysts administer cases while trained field agents investigate

For instance, within the Secret Service, each case is centrally administered by special agents and intelligence analysts at Secret Service Headquarters in Washington, DC, while the investigative work for those cases is conducted by special agents in Secret Service Field Offices around the world, all of whom have been trained in behavioral threat assessment methodology.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p028-04

Field agents interview, assess and manage while Headquarters coordinates and documents

In other words, Secret Service field agents routinely conduct interviews, review records, write reports, make assessments, and employ behavioral management strategies, while those processes are centrally coordinated, reviewed, and documented at Secret Service Headquarters.

p. 28 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 28 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 28 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Fact [V] p031-05

Secret Service processes all Protective Intelligence information via a central operations center

The Secret Service receives information relevant to the agency’s protective mission from a variety of sources, including concerned bystanders, law enforcement agencies, and other organizations. Regardless of the source, all information with a Protective Intelligence nexus is collected and processed through a centralized operations center within the Secret Service.

p. 31 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 31 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 31 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p038-01

Five foundational principles of behavioral threat assessment, including low threshold

This approach is based on foundational principles identified by NTAC research and the Secret Service’s pioneering efforts in the field, which have established that behavioral threat assessment: • utilizes a low threshold of concern, • requires corroboration from diverse sources, • emphasizes rapport building, • is not profiling, and • is not prediction.

p. 38 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 38 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 38 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Evidence [V] p041-01

Secret Service research pioneered the Systems Approach in its 1998 guide

Secret Service research pioneered the Systems Approach to behavioral threat assessment when it published Protective Intelligence and Threat Assessment Investigations: A Guide for State and Local Law Enforcement Officials in 1998.

p. 41 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 41 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 41 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Conclusion [V] p072-03

Following the guide lets agencies adopt the Secret Service model and a structured approach

By following the steps in this operational guide, state and local law enforcement agencies will be able to adopt the pioneering principles of the Secret Service’s behavioral threat assessment model and move toward a structured approach to targeted violence prevention.

p. 72 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 72 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 72 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page
Statement [V] p073-03

Secret Service model was developed to identify, assess and manage individuals posing risk

The Secret Service behavioral threat assessment model was developed to identify individuals displaying threatening or concerning behavior, gather information to assess if an individual poses a risk of violence, and then manage the risk by implementing appropriate interventions (identify, assess, manage).

p. 73 · NCIER Claim Map
Report page 73 with the cited passage highlighted
Source page 73 · click to enlarge · all claims on this page

Top

Find the Perfect Training Class For You